When it comes to research findings and related conclusions, it is depending on what is subjective (i.e., subjectivity) and what is objective (i.e., objectivity). As i may claim, subjectivity is changing from one to one, as well from society to another, and from time to time, depending on social as well cultural evolution and change.
When it comes to objectivity, new innovations and new productions in technologies lead to new readings and different data, Hence, do we have to take findings in research and related conclusions as final? Or what?
Please, your kind contribution to the initiated discussion.
It's depends on the field of research. In the mathematics sciences subjectivity is excluded, while in the social sciences it is not always possible, and perhaps not desirable.
I'm researching about employees perception of effectiveness, so in a short time, I will share the article.
Group subjectivity or belief systems indeed can change from society to society. But even in the same group if what is measured is not based on data, it is subjective. Objectivity of means that it doesn't matter who the individual is or the culture group, the fact stays the same.
What you are measuring whether subjective or objective, you must do it in an objective matter. You can measure opinions which are very subjective, but you can count them. So in research you have to consider all data and deal with them in a objective manner.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Econ
- Innovation Economics
- Innovation