Erich J. Lerner has written an excellent book about how mankind, become so attached to a frame of reference, that is almost impossible, to make a real paradigm shift; in this case it has to do with the theory of the Big Bang, he writes:
“THE PLASMA ALTERNATIVE
The test of scientific theory is the correspondence of predictions and observation, and the Big Bang has flunked. It predicts that there should be no objects in the universe older than twenty billion years and larger than 150 million light-years across. There are. It predicts that the universe, on such a large scale, should be smooth and homogeneous. The universe isn't. The theory predicts that, to produce the galaxies we see around us from the tiny fluctuations evident in the microwave background, there must be a hundred times as much dark matter as visible matter. There's no evidence that there's any dark matter at all. And if there is no dark matter, the theory predicts, no galaxies will form. Yet there they are, scattered across the sky. We live in one.”
Why is it so difficult to make a paradigm shift even in science?
This was the case with complex numbers too, as is shown in “An Imaginary Tale The Story of sqr(-1), by an Emerithus Professor of EE, in the University of New Hampshire, Paul J. Nahim
Dear Edgar Paternina This article presenting that our universe as a complete entity and it is not result of big bang,
Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted
Nothingness could grow with the unstoppable time while becoming positive and negative emptinesses of time relative to each other. Time is a moment of spacetime. A moment is a point of existence. A point of time is relative to the 6 directions and dimensions, and they exist relatively. Each point with time is like a baby universe. And they could make the relative existence relative to the directions and dimensions. Time could grow the universe, making and continuing the points of unstoppable time. The meaning of time is a continuation. Prof. Einstein can't change it using his principles. Everything experiences time, but sometimes it is not very obvious. Time could be the creator of everything, and time can move everything. It is extremely logical. Time is not a clock. The entire universe is completely new at each moment if time is the fundamental limit at each point. And those new points of time could make and maintain the limits of constants because the points of time are always new and relational to each other. Time could exist before space, and that is why anything starts and continues. Infinity is infinite if it is not relative. Infinite nothingness could be the infinite negative time in the completely nothing universe. And that moment of nothingness could be both infinitely large and infinitely small because it could not be relative to anything. And then, time could continue to the positive time from point to point because a small point of nothingness doesn't have a permanent location if time continues. Therefore, it could increase with time from point to point. Completely nothingness is also a thing even if nothing existed in the nothingness in the earliest universe. And time is the thing that must flow in the universe. The universe was a thing even if it was completely nothing because it was the only thing that could experience time. It is a simple logic. Time continues inside the Planck volume. And time is a fundamental reality even if it is completely new at each moment.
The entire universe had a start. But it doesn't mean that it had an infinite density and it started to expand like a balloon. It could start from a point, and it could expand from point to point. Therefore, the edge of the entire universe would expand forever. The eternal growth of the universe could start an uncountable time ago. Most probably, we only observe some parts of cyclic continuations in the observable universe. Real mathematics starts from zero, but some theorists tried to say that the universe started with strange mathematics that instantly jumps from nothingness to a point with an infinitely huge density. And they don't explain any reason for the growth of space after the formation of the infinite density. There is no reason to think that Black Holes make space (Dark Energy) while becoming more massive. Most likely, some Black Holes accelerate the flow of space materials between galaxies because they would absorb space materials to become more massive. A balloon expands somewhat uniformly when air comes into it, and space comes in while it is expanding. But it doesn't make extra material space. The earliest growth of the universe and some interactions could make both space and matter. The observable universe is not the entire universe as the nearest galaxy is not the only galaxy. And some theories only relate to the frame of reference. High-density space materials could come from all around the universe into low-density regions of space, causing an expansion if quantum gravity supported it. Space materials would travel faster or slower or at the speed of light depending on their interactions with forces and because the speed of light and other elements depends on the density of space (medium) and their wave symmetry (mass distribution). Presumably, light (photons) and similar high-speed waves represent highly symmetric cancellations of opposite dimensions while becoming. So then, electrons would represent an amount of widely effective uncancelled dimensions on its asymmetric structure. Thus, gluons likely contain overly cancelable dimensional structures that cancel dimensions in other materials too. Quantum fields can change mass and speed. Kinetic energy can't make mass, and it only represents high-speed mass.
My research: Preprint Verifying The Origin Of Everything
Yes, I also think that the big bang never happened and that we live in a closed eternal universe, structured like a 3-sphere.
In this universe, star fuel gets recycled from black hole matter about after every 20 billion years. During that period a cosmic field, which warps the space to the 3-sphere shape, collects the energy needed for star fuel recycling via gravitational interaction from moving particles or photons.
The cosmic field compensates the negative energy density of gravitational fields.
The physical background of the theory is the fact, that the energy density of gravitational fields is negative and the fact that an absolute negative energy density cannot exist.
For further details refer to: Preprint What gravitation really is
Dear Edgar Paternina
What you wrote can be supported with the material of the following article:
Article Fizikailag-metafizikailag bizonyítható a graviton létezése
The response to your question: 'Why is it so difficult to make a paradigm shift even in science?' is simple.
It would not be conducive to the political environment of the current global social order,
Regards,
Laszlo
Dear Dr. Wolfgang Konle,
According to my analysis of the Buddha's teachings, a cyclic period of this island universe called Maha-Kalpa is approximately 1 trilion x 1 billion years or more than 2 trilion years.
In one explanation, there are four different lengths of kalpas. A regular kalpa is approximately 16 million years long (16,798,000 years), and a small kalpa is 1000 regular kalpas, or about 16.8 billion years. Further, a medium kalpa is roughly 336 billion years, the equivalent of 20 small kalpas. A great kalpa is four medium kalpas, or about 1.3 trillion years.
The Buddha said, "Imagine a huge empty cube at the beginning of a kalpa (a Great Aeon), approximately 16 miles (a yojana) in each side. Once every 100 years, you insert a tiny mustard seed into the cube. According to the Buddha, the huge cube will be filled even before the kalpa ends.
If you count the total number of sand particles at the depths of the Ganges river, from where it begins to where it ends at the sea, even that number will be less than the number of passed kalpas.
Were a man to take a piece of cloth of this most delicate texture [of fine cotton], and therewith to touch in the slightest possible manner, once in a hundred years, a solid rock, free from earth, a yojana [~14 miles] high, and as much broad, the time would come when it would be worn down, by this imperceptible trituration, to the size of a mung or undu seed. This period would be immense in its duration; but it has been declared by Buddha that it would not be equal to a Maha Kalpa."
- Badges
- Science topic