Hello everyone, 

I'm researching leaf veination architecture, specifically leaf vein density (LVD), where I need to be able to take high resolution photos of leaves. An article posted by one of the leading authors in this field wrote a paper (Price, et al. 2014) illustrating that because your software's analysis (be it LeafGUI or ImageJ or whatever you choose) will improve with increasing photo resolution there should be a minimum requirement that needs to be met for your data to be accurate enough. They provide a formula to calculate this minimum requirement stating that,

"When a digital camera is employed to acquire images, the image size must be sufficiently large such that there are at least two pixels in the image spanning a distance equal to the magnified resolving power of the microscope."

The formula they propose is 2/(Mdmin) 

Where

M=magnification

dmin=resolving power=λ0/NA

Where 

λ0= mean wavelenth of light (assumed to be 0.53 um for white light)

NA=numerical aperature of the objective lens

My question is; is this formula translatable to a non-microscope imager such as a scanner or a DSLR camera?

Thank you for your time,

Victoria K.

Similar questions and discussions