Chess engines are 25% higher than the grandmasters and world champion Magnus Carlsen by the strength of the game. Their indications are treated as reference in relation to human strategies.
State management can also be treated as a strategic game. When will we entrust the government of the state to computer systems to avoid the incompetence and corruption of our politicians?
Good afternoon, very interesting topic for discussion
It seems to me that never. If we base our reasoning on the axioms of Game Theory (which claims that chess is not an intellectual game, but simply a more complicated version of the game of tic-tac-toe), this approach works rather poorly for predicting human behavior. This is mainly due to the fact that people think irrationally.
As an example of this, I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the Harvard game.
Artem Panchenko wrote:
.... This is mainly due to the fact that people think irrationally ...
Galus:
People try to think rationally. They are disturbed by emotions, although on the other hand, they increase their motivation to act effectively and rationally. People need an adequate model of reality so that their rational actions bring rational results. The state model must be extremely simplified to a level that is understandable to people. Thus, we simplify it to play chess. And here computers have a decisive advantage.
If it so happens that one day the world would be entirely run by computer systems, then that would definitely be the end of corruption that has plagued many countries for centuries.
Prof. Wiesław Galus
Yes, computer systems( I guess in a way of games) can play a role in developing as Prof. Ahmed T. Hussein says in his post in destroying corruption or the totally opposite case, in destroying a country.
AI also can be used to destroy a foreign country's resources and infrastructure. I can showcase the case of Venezuela and several foreign telecom/heavy industries companies' interventions around the 2016 hyperinflation year.
A deep learning algorithm could do it very well, there is only need a set of well-trained data with a guinea pig country. Still, we sometimes here feel that a computer game is ruling us deeper into the hole of no return.
The GDP is basically gone by corruption in Venezuela, but how that corruption was planned? It looks like a game/science fiction movie well played.
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/venezuela-crisis
Best Regards.
The substitution of human actions in favor of purely computational decisions means the end of humanity.
Pedro L. Contreras E. wrote: .....or the totally opposite case, in destroying a country.
Wieslaw: Such a case can happen if AI is in the position of a dictator. The use of AI does not rule out democracy. But it's probably more difficult than building a strong AI.
Partially yes because recently we have what is called electronic governments.
Prof. Wiesław Galus, in our case, AI came as a gift to the dictator from abroad.
What we had was a developed telecom infrastructure, but adding data analysis and algorithms was from abroad.
Thank you for the reply. Best Regards.
Dear Hadeel,
That it is indispensable is not enough. Can it replace corrupt politicians and manage the state on its own? That is the question
I think that the computer should be employed as an intelligent web to connect people and media or data according to rights, and that the rights of access are directly connected to governance which should just be one of the channels that people can participate in.
all https requests should be evaluated according to the rights of the person or app requesting access or modifications
people should still have the power they need, and the computer systems should cultivate and protect that.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Epi
- Age Groups
- Children