Should artificial intelligence technology take on the role of a leader in the organisational management process, or should leaders still be human?
AI can be designed to optimise organisational management processes such as performance analysis, project management and task delegation. The question is whether AI should take on the role of a leader in an organisation or whether people should remain responsible for making key decisions. Research shows that AI technology in the role of an organisation leader can improve the efficiency of processes based on data and optimisation of activities. On the other hand, AI as an organisation leader may not take into account the important emotional and social elements that are key to people management. Therefore, perhaps the best solution is to combine human leaders with AI tools that support decisions and optimise processes, but do not replace human interaction. In light of this, the question is about the evolution of the role of leaders in organisations. Although AI can bring huge benefits in terms of efficiency, process optimisation and analysis, it cannot replace people's leadership skills, which include aspects such as team motivation, intuition and conflict resolution. People have the ability to make decisions based on moral and ethical values, which is crucial in managing organisations. AI can be a powerful tool to support leaders, but it should not completely replace them in the role of decision makers.
My articles below are related to the above issues in some aspects:
I have described the key issues of the opportunities and threats to the development of artificial intelligence technologies in my article below:
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR NORMATIVE REGULATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
Article OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL I...
I have described crisis management in companies in the article:
CRISES IN THE ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS ENTITIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT
Article CRISES IN THE ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS ENTITIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT
I have described the application of Big Data technology in sentiment analysis, business analytics and risk management in my co-authored article:
APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE IN INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT IN ORGANISATION
Article APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTEL...
And what is your opinion on this matter?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
I invite you to scientific cooperation,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
First, I would like to mentioned that I agree with your findings, which align with my personal views and the evidence I gathered from existing literature. In today's technology-driven landscape, AI technology is increasingly recognized as a significant asset in the corporate world from various stakeholders' perspectives. Particularly in terms of operational efficiency, waste minimization, and usability, AI presents certain advantages over human resources. However, the initial investment can be quite substantial to implement AI technologies, and also ongoing technological advancements may cause to decline the value of current AI applications.
Furthermore, as a technological progression, AI does not replicate human behavior entirely due to the existing psychological differences of human. It remains an evolving technology that has yet to develop the capacity for genuine empathy and human-like interaction (Pelau et al., 2021). In addition to that, in considering the ethical relationship between humans and AI, current AI technology may not always provide clear guidance for users on distinguishing right from wrong. When considering the creativity, the capacity for human creativity and logical reasoning remains more advanced than that of AI, emphasizing the significance of human leadership and engagement for corporate world in guiding technological advancements without solely relying on AI technologies.
References
Pelau, C., Dabija, D. C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122.
Beyond that, I would be very interested in collaborating on research related to digital technologies, sustainability, and entrepreneurship.
Thank you!
K.A.D.Nuwanthika Kodagoda
AI can play a supporting role in decision-making by analyzing data and optimizing processes, but human managers should still lead. Human judgment, empathy, creativity, and ethical considerations are crucial in managing organizations, especially in complex, unpredictable situations.
The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in organizational leadership is a complex debate that balances efficiency, ethics, and human-centered decision-making. While AI can support leadership, it is not yet suited to replace human leaders entirely.
Why AI Can Play a Leadership Role
Why Human Leaders Are Still Essential
The Ideal Approach: Human-AI Collaboration
Instead of choosing between AI or human leadership, organizations should adopt a hybrid leadership model where:
- AI supports decision-making by providing insights and automating processes.
- Humans handle strategic thinking, ethics, and interpersonal aspects of leadership.
Conclusion
AI should act as a powerful assistant rather than a replacement for human leaders. Leadership is not just about efficiency—it’s about people, values, and vision, areas where human leaders excel.
Πραγματικα είναι άξιο συζήτησης και επιστημονικής έρευνας οι ανισότητες που θα δημιουργηθούν απο την ενσωμάτωση της Τεχνητής Νοημοσύνης σε σχέση με το ανθρώπινο μυαλό . Σίγουρα οι δικλείδες ασφάλειας που εξυπακούεται οτι πρέπει να δημιουργηθούν επιβάλλεται να καταστήσουν την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ως βοηθητικό Προσωπικό στα νεα οργανογραμματα των Οργανισμων που θα δημιουργηθουν .
Dear Researchers, Scientists, Friends,
The question, "Should artificial intelligence technology play a leading role in the management of organizations, or should managers continue to be human?" still strikes me as extremely relevant and fascinating, and the discussion on this topic is not only advisable but absolutely necessary, as is further research aimed at a thorough understanding of the implications of this transformation. From my observations and ongoing research, it's clear that while the potential of artificial intelligence in optimizing management processes is undeniable, fundamental aspects of human leadership, such as empathy, emotional intelligence, relationship building, and decision-making based on ethical values, remain irreplaceable. The relevance of this question stems from the continuous technological advancement in the field of AI and its increasingly widespread implementation in various areas of organizational activity, which raises new challenges and opportunities. In the future, I believe it will be crucial to investigate how the capabilities of AI can be effectively integrated with the unique competencies of human leaders, creating hybrid management models. New research areas could include the analysis of AI's impact on organizational culture, the ethical aspects of algorithmic decision-making in human resource management, or the role of AI in supporting team creativity and innovation. The determinants shaping the future of management will undoubtedly be the maturity of AI technology, legal regulations regarding its use, the adaptability of organizations, and the willingness and skills of managers to collaborate with intelligent systems. I would like to thank all researchers and scientists for their past contributions to this important discussion. I am open to any form of scientific collaboration in this dynamically evolving field and encourage the continuation of this vital debate.
I invite you to discuss this issue and to engage in scientific cooperation,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
While AI can enhance organizational efficiency, forecasting, and decision-making, human managers are still essential for interpreting complex social dynamics, ethical considerations, creativity, and empathetic leadership, making a hybrid model the most balanced and effective approach.
- Badges
- Science topic