Take inputs from AI

But final diagnosis only by doctors

In my opinion, Professor, AI technology can be a valuable tool in diagnosing diseases, providing data-driven insights, pattern recognition, and efficiency that can complement physician expertise. However, it should not completely replace physician opinion, as human judgment, empathy, and the ability to consider the patient’s detailed history and context are crucial for accurate and personalized diagnosis. The ideal approach is a collaborative one, in which AI assists physicians by analyzing large amounts of data and identifying potential issues, while physicians interpret the results, make final decisions, and provide comprehensive care. This synergy can increase diagnostic accuracy, reduce errors, and improve patient outcomes. In fact, artificial intelligence will play the role of advisor for doctors.

AI technology can assist in diagnosing illnesses by providing data-driven insights, but a doctor’s opinion is crucial for interpreting results, considering patient history, and making final decisions. The best approach combines AI's efficiency with human expertise.

Artificial intelligence (AI) should be used as a tool to assist doctors in diagnosing disease, but the final decision should rest with doctors.

AI should be used as a complementary tool in diagnosis, not a replacement for doctors. It can analyze vast data and detect patterns, enhancing accuracy and efficiency. However, medical diagnosis also requires clinical judgment, patient history, and ethical considerations—areas where doctors excel. The best approach is human-AI collaboration, ensuring both technological precision and professional expertise in patient care.

Health is sensitive domain,we shouldn't pick one. instead we should take opinion from both than take a final decision.

It is possible and often necessary to use artificial intelligence in a doctor's work. It allows one to quickly find the necessary information, but it is not right to rely only on it.

Despite the era of AI that was markedly introduced in all fields ,I do believe that AI couldn't replace doctors . The human beings body is one of the most complex things in life . It never came as described in books . Despite the experience you get in medicine ,human be will continue to surprise you every day with unexpected diagnosis .

I think AI has a lot of potential and it should always be considered as a very useful tool, however the final opinion and verdict should really come from a doctor.

I support this point of view.

The primary diagnosis should come from the doctor, but AI can play a supporting role. That is, doctors can utilize AI to assist them, not to make diagnoses on their behalf.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

On of my professors said " AI is better called Digital support for human intelligence"

Yes I agree with most responses.

Differently AI should have a role but under control and supervision from doctors.

AI is collaborative tool to doctors!

Towards equitable AI in oncology

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to dramatically change several aspects of oncology including diagnosis, early detection and treatment-related decision making. However, many of the underlying algorithms have been or are being trained on datasets that do not necessarily reflect the diversity of the target population. For this, and other reasons, many AI tools might not be suitable for application in less economically developed countries and/or in patients of certain ethnicities. In this Perspective, the authors discuss possible sources of inequity in AI development, and how to ensure the development and implementation of equitable AI tools for use in patients with cancer...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-024-00909-8

The ideal approach is collaboration, where AI tools support doctors by enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reducing errors, while doctors retain the final say, integrating AI insights with their professional judgment and experience. , Therefore, I believe we should use AI as a tool, not as a replacement. The future of diagnosis is likely a partnership between intelligent machines and skilled human clinicians.

I'm still a fourth-year medical student, but I see the need to introduce such a powerful tool into our daily work at the hospital, since it can reduce our error margin to almost zero in most case scenarios. Plus, it can correlate data that would take the human mind hours to process. We should view it as an ally, not an enemy. With AI, our work can become more efficient and secure.

AI can guide, but only doctors can decide.