17 February 2017 2 2K Report

I am currently working in Cameroon on wildlife assessment with camera-traps, aim to compare faunal biodiversity between 4 different land tenures regimes. The objective is to quantify afterwards diversities indices between 4 sites. After discussions with specialists, I would like to have your opinion. I plan to divide my 44 cameras into 4 grids, corresponding to my 4 land tenures regimes, during 3 months. Cameras will be placed with a distance of 1.4 km between each other (TEAM protocol). I have 11 cameras available for each grid, but I have an important question about one of them: one of our land tenures regimes is composed of 3 distinct community forests of 5,000 hectares each.

We have three possibilities concerning the distribution of cameras for this land tenure: (i) we can use 3-4 cameras in each community forest during 3 months, (ii) we can set up 11 cameras in each community forest one by one and each during 1 month (but it will not be possible to keep the 1.4km distance between cameras, considering the small size of community forests), or (iii) we can put the all 11 cameras in only one community forest during 3 months, but taking maybe then less heterogeneity of landscape patterns.

Would it be better to maximize the sampled zone with a maximum of time and a minimum of cameras, or to reduce the time and put more cameras in each sub-zone? Are 700-800 camera-trap days ( < 1000 camera-trap days) enough to obtain valuable data ?

Thanks a lot!

More Simon Lhoest's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions