Response to “Did AI prove our proton model WRONG?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbzZIMQC6vk
Your video brought two things to mind - the book “The Grand Design” by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, and the picture of the TARDIS – Doctor Who’s blue “telephone box” that travels anywhere in space and time. Combining these with the early experimental hints of a charm quark existing inside the proton suggests there may be experimental support for intergalactic and time travel, as proposed by the following interpretation of the Riemann hypothesis and inverse-square law.
Owing to a phenomenon called Colour Confinement, quarks can never exist in isolation – they’re found combined within protons, neutrons, and mesons. “The Grand Design” states,
“The question of whether it makes sense to say quarks really exist if you can never isolate one was a controversial issue in the years after the quark model was first proposed.” “It is certainly possible that some alien beings with seventeen arms, infrared eyes and a habit of blowing clotted cream out their ears would make the same experimental observations that we do, but describe them without quarks.”
If the quark model is used, a charm quark existing inside a proton reminds me of the repeated comment on Dr. Who shows that the Tardis is bigger (has more volume) on the inside than the outside. The charm quark in the proton is a bigger MASS. This can make us wonder if the charm quark in the proton is, like the Tardis, associated with travel anywhere in space and time. The bigger volume or mass inside can be exaggerated to equal infinity while the smaller volume or mass viewed from the outside can be exaggerated to equal zero.
What happens if we don’t use the quark model but rely on the aliens’ model, which may be purely mathematical? (The final paragraph speaks of particles' centres occupying identical space-time coordinates. Current knowledge says this is impossible for fermions but in a purely mathematical universe which is as malleable and flexible as any image on a computer screen, the quark model doesn't necessarily apply and a future theory of quantum gravity could unite bosons and space itself with fermions in a kind of supersymmetry.)
The Riemann hypothesis doesn’t just apply to the distribution of prime numbers but can also apply to the fundamental structure of the mathematical universe’s space-time. In mapping the distribution of prime numbers, the Riemann hypothesis is concerned with the locations of “nontrivial zeros” on the “critical line”, and says these zeros must lie on the vertical line of the Complex Number Plane (CNP). Besides having a real part, zeros in the critical line (the y-axis) have an imaginary part (an equally real part described with “imaginary” numbers). This is reflected in the real +1 and -1 of the x-axis in the CNP, as well as by the imaginary +i and -i of the y-axis. In the upper half-plane of the CNP, a quarter rotation plus a quarter rotation equals a half – both quadrants begin with positive values and ¼ + ¼ = ½. (The Riemann hypothesis states that the real part of every nontrivial zero must be 1/2.) While in the lower half-plane, both quadrants begin with negative numbers and a quarter rotation plus a negative quarter rotation equals zero: 1/4 + (-1/4) = 0.
The inverse-square law states that the force between two particles becomes infinite if the distance by which they’re separated goes to zero. Remembering that gravitation partly depends on the distance between the centres of objects, the separation only goes to zero when those centres occupy identical space-time coordinates (not merely when the objects’ sides are touching). That is – infinity equals the total elimination of distance, or zero. Remembering that the holographic-universe theory - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klpDHn8viX8- hints at the possibility of deletion of the 3rd dimension, the cosmos could possess this absence of distance in space and time via the electronic mechanism of binary digits which would make the universe as malleable and flexible as any image on a computer screen. If infinity is the total deletion of distance in space-time, there is nothing to rule out instant intergalactic travel or time travel to the past and remote future. Infinity does not equal nothing – nor does zero. Zero would be something if it’s paired with one to form the binary digits used in electronics.
Dear Rodney Bartlett up to date science never been observed anything inside of atom. Science does not have any explanation for proton/neutron or electron/positron, quark etc. Atom that we know, does not act mechanically as our icon believe. Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted
The short answer is, No. It's known that protons are bound states of three, so-called, ``valence quarks'', namely two up quarks and one down quark, that are bound by gluons. The video mixes too many things up. It is possible to interpret excited states of the proton in terms of pairs of a quark and an antiquark, within the proton, which can be of all possible quark kinds, among them the charm quark. This doesn't change the model for the proton, however, since these are always pairs. Therein lies the difference between these quarks (also called ``sea quarks'') and the valence quarks. This isn't anything new. What is new is that it has recently become possible to compute the contribution of the ``sea quarks'', that are heavier than the strange quark, to the properties of the proton. This contribution is Standard Model background at LHC energies, so it is crucial to have it under quantitative control, in order to subtract it and find new processes, that implicate particles beyond the Standard Model.
- Badges
- Science topic