What do you think of different interpretations on quantum mechanics? Check out the following papers.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a176/ba4b9ce38309ab7529254d2e1d30b0bf7d5b.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9609002.pdf
The implications are dependent on the morality of the conclusion.
Just as "overpopulation" is "solved" by "depopulation" - thereby some solutions are worse than their problem/question supposes,
the many-worlds interpretation may provide feasibility for quantum immortality which would be counter productive to the peacekeeping process.
Godel's incompleteness theorem might suggest that while QP/QM is complete, it becomes inconsistent with other theories.
But a "realists" interpretation seems incomplete without making sense of the "imaginary" components.
The 3 dimensions of space used as R^3 need each to have their imaginary vectors - does this imply any singular dimension can, by virtue of the square-root function, give rise to a hidden dimension?
Does this apply to imaginary dimension itself (no, because root(i) is solvable in C), But does this need apply to an infinite dimensional space (like the Hilbert)? Yes.
Wouldn't it be curious if a correct interpretation of QM implied a non-cohesiveness with Observational reports in the Legal discipline? Which discipline is stronger?
Does the Hilbert Space model of QM account for parametric down conversion, or is that why we seem to need hidden variables?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Papers