10 days is enough :)

Well, on demand, in real time and for free. Perfect when your agenda is empty.

I never answered predatory journals emails. This is also one of them. But if I had decided to answer them, I would say what are you doing with science? what are you doing with people of the world and also with our earth? I would ask them, when you want me to peer review a paper in ten days, what is the quality? I would ask them if money is so important for them to defame themselves and be notorious for ever?

It is not joke that the number of books about misconducts and frauds in sciences is in rise,

for example this one,

The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science 2004

9780151008773

OR

Fraud and Misconduct in Research: Detection, Investigation, and Organizational Response, 2017.

9780472123230

They end up here in future editions or future titles of books regarding frauds in sciences.

Maybe some people find the above paragraph be me strange, if so, then have a look at these discussions and then judge.

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Questionable_but_yet_powerful_phenomena_in_scientific_journals_even_top_ones_is_I_publish_where_I_edit_Obviously_we_can_not_ask_them_why_and_how

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Bibliometrics_Scientometrics_and_the_like_are_more_harmful_than_useful_in_styles_and_methods_that_are_practiced_now

and also my contributions to this discussion

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Comments_papers_how_should_they_be_dealt_with_by_a_Journal

@Andrew Paul McKenzie Pegman

Also concerning answers by Andrew Pegman, I strongly suggest that you and others see what went on between him and me in another discussion in mid 2022, then think twice, if you want to answer his very general just several word answers.

https://www.researchgate.net/post/As_depicted_in_the_picture_can_these_be_considered_plagiarism