Many researchers have studied the shape memory property of polyurethanes (PUs) by considering the melting temperature of the soft segment (for example as in PCL based PUs) as transition temperature. In this case, the polymer will not lose its flexibility (as the Tg is well below the Tm) when the shape fixing process is performed at T < Tm. However, if Tg is considered as the transition temperature, the material becomes brittle during the shape fixation process, as the polymer has to cool well below the Tg. Thus in the programmed shape (also called fixed shape or temporary shape) the material will lose its flexibility. In a real application which one (Tg or Tm) is better to consider as transition temperature?

Similar questions and discussions