"Today, democracy is facing numerous challenges. Many say it is our duty as democratic scholars to defend democracy in its present form, not to question it. They argue that our search for a more comprehensive concept of democracy opens up a Pandora's Box. It thus also puts the core norms of democracy up for discussion, which risks undermining democracy, or hollowing out its value."

This quote is from Norma Osterberg-Kaufmann, Toralf Stark, and Christoph Mohammad-Klotzbach's essay here: https://theloop.ecpr.eu/democracy-is-an-essentially-contested-concept/

Is the study of marginalised, lost and forgotten concepts and conceptions of "democracy", and the search for a "common core" among them, really putting democracy as it is conventionally known at risk today?

What do you think? If not, why?

If it does - is that not a good thing? Shouldn't we be trying to establish ever better, fuller, maximal, and pervasive democracies instead of guarding what have arguably always been racist, sexist, exclusionary, and capitalist forms of so-called "democratic rule" which are now becoming even more disfigured?

More Jean-Paul Gagnon's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions