Non-repudiation is a legal term defined as protection against an individual falsely denying having performed a particular action. It provides the capability to determine whether a given individual took a specific action, such as created information, approved information or sent or received a message.
Social media platforms such as WhatsApp have a function which allows one to send a message to an individual or a group and DELETE the message from all the recipients leaving them with no evidence of what has been sent. This allows the sender to deny having sent such a message. Read-once messages which get destroyed upon being read can also be a breach of non-repudiation on Social Media platforms.
What is your view of these functions on social media platforms? Legally are they acceptable?
Usually one can delete a message on WhatsApp with one caveat where a trace is left with a 'message deleted' label. This is a very interesting topic and I would like to read on it more.
Social media platforms can be prone to abuse when it concerns the legality behind non-repudiation. Non-repudiation is the principle that ensures that a party cannot deny the authenticity of a message or action they have taken. This principle is critical in legal settings as it helps to establish accountability and prevent fraud.
However, on social media platforms, it can be challenging to establish non-repudiation due to the nature of the platform. Social media platforms are designed to facilitate communication and sharing, making it easy for users to post content without necessarily establishing their identity or authenticity. This can make it difficult to establish accountability, particularly in cases where there is a need for legal action.
For instance, on social media platforms, it is common to see users post comments, images, or videos that can be used as evidence in legal proceedings. However, establishing the authenticity of such content can be challenging, particularly when the user denies having posted the content. In such cases, it may be difficult to establish non-repudiation, and this can make it challenging to establish accountability and prevent fraud.
In conclusion, social media platforms can be prone to abuse when it concerns the legality behind non-repudiation. While social media platforms can facilitate communication and sharing, the challenge of establishing non-repudiation can make it difficult to establish accountability and prevent fraud in legal settings. Therefore, it is essential to have robust mechanisms for establishing non-repudiation on social media platforms to prevent abuse and ensure accountability.
Very well articulated Aduragbemi David Ogundijo Social media platforms do pose challenges we might not be ready to face at the present moment. It all comes back to the level of awareness of users of social media platforms towards the legal etiquette, acceptable use, and kinds of misuse they might be committing knowingly and unknowingly. We need to be more exposed.
Yes, social media platforms are prone to abuse when it comes to non-repudiation. This is because social media platforms do not always provide an adequate level of security when it comes to verifying the identity of users and ensuring the authenticity of any content they post. This can lead to situations where the identity of the user cannot be verified and the content posted cannot be verified as genuine. This could lead to potential legal issues, such as if a post is used as evidence in a legal dispute, but the user is not able to prove that they were the one who posted the conte
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Citations