Dear all,
I am seeking help in regards to narrowing down my topic for my masters thesis in International Business & Management. My research proposal was recently rejected by my supervisor, with my topic being too broad and that I failed to identify a significant gap. The initial aim of my research question was to investigate the barriers of foreign divestment facing firms in the automotive industry operating in the UK after Brexit. I was aiming to take a qualitative exploratory study. This choice is largely due to the fact I find quantitative quite tricky and was advised to do qualitative.
To give some background I was researching this because A potential withdrawal of investment was raised by automotive firms such as Nissan and Ford, with concerns that sufficient profits could no longer be made. Despite these negative effects, Nissan and Ford, along with other firms in the automotive industry, have not divested from the U.K. My thesis aimed at examine why this is, specifically, the barriers to exit firms may face in their decision to divest from UK. In my literature review then I highlighted the barriers to exit that were outlined by Porter in 1976 which included economic, strategic and managerial barriers. My supervisor explained that because I already explained in the literature review what barriers were there, that no gap existed. They suggested I look at one particular barrier and investigate that. I have looked at economic barriers such as sunk costs and managerial barriers such as agency theory, self identity theory etc but I have still failed to find a gap. I have also looked at escalation of commitment (sunk cost fallacy) but there also seems to be significant literature on it. I was also considering international commitment but not sure how I would approach it.
Can anyone provide me with any guidance how I can narrow down and develop a strong research question?
Thanks,
Rebecca