Do the Flying saucers contain giant wheels as a century fuse (e.g. to create artificial gravity – by spinning at high-speed)?
Is the shape of a saucer (i.e. shape of magnifying or convex lens) is ideal shape for deflecting space debris (e.g. to minimize damage)?
If mankind wish to travel to nearby planets such as Mars, don’t we need to study the reasons or possible advantages for saucer shape?
I am not saying, aliens travelled to Earth. But we all know that the most popular shape for the UFO is Flying saucers.
I like to know pros and cons and thoughts who have done more investigation. I am just a curious bystander. I saw a small bit on returning of US astronaut after nearly spending one year in the space. Also the news mentioned that, it would take about 1 year just to reach Mars.
This is the weekend, so wish to explore something fun and interesting. If UFO contains a gain-wheel/centrifuge. How many hours a day should we need to run the gain-wheel/centrifuge to maintain healthy bone mass density?
Of course, it is possible to run the gain-wheel/centrifuge at different speeds in order to exert different weight (e.g. ranging from 0.5G or 1.5G). Of course, such power consumption can be meat by a mini nuclear power plant. I am sure, such advanced civilizations could have developed such mini nuclear power plant.
Best Regards,
Raju Chiluvuri
Hi Raju,
I am not an expert but most of the UFO illusion come frome the "Lenticular cloud". And this cloud look like a... giant saucer! So it could the very simple reason why the most common shape for flying saucer is a "saucer".
@Marchal, thank you for answer. My other part of question is, is there any advantages in building spaceships going to Mars or distant planets in the shape of saucer? One obvious benefit is artificial gravity by using centrifuge/giant-wheel. If astronaut travels in weightless environment for nearly a year, he can’t walk on the planet.
Also chances are very less, but can’t rule out possibility of space debris. Slanted surfaces can deflect the small particles more effectively than flat surfaces.
So what is the best shape to build interplanetary spaceships? Is it saucer shape is one of the best shapes?
Also, for example, if the distant planet has atmosphere similar to the Earth, what is the best shape to enter the atmosphere? Can a rotating saucer reduce fiction (e.g. by evenly distributing the heat on all sides, by rotating surface of the front entry)?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology