The following realities about laws have kept for example logical truths as unadequate for science. Certain values like factuality/concrete less, econiny/multicase applicability, have given the a high stand and invicibility status. Other values are the self-awareness and responsibiliy and realism, refrain from existential remarks.
Factual truths are great but they are not as its believed the pinnacle of description of nature or scientific prose. Their main ommision is that we haven't developped any logical truths about science.
The same goes for the point about laws as generalizations. Because generalizations are a powerful means and economic, it does not mean that possible discovery of non generalizable statements about nature would rendervotself use less.
Another point is about lack of ontological statements. Stars exist is such one.
Hmm ... I think it is more the "knowledge filter" of trying to be mainstream and traditionally established as mentioned in the book "Forbidden Archeology" by PHD Richard Thompson and in my book Book yogapsychologie
We do need to analyse our present sciences. We are in quicksand, going nowhere.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Cartography
- Mapping
- Maps