Must note that it will require secondary analysis of data already collected

Also there is a lot of case studies or reviews that are not exactly the topic of my study

May be Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy ( https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/research-in-social-and-administrative-pharmacy )

they says in https://www.elsevier.com/journals/research-in-social-and-administrative-pharmacy/15517411/guide-for-authors this:

" Study Protocols. RSAP seeks to publish protocols that have formal ethical approval and funding from a recognized, research-funding body (such as those listed by the JULIET project). Please provide information about ethical approval and research funding source when uploading your protocol. Any protocols meeting these criteria might or might not be subject to peer review. Those not meeting these criteria will be sent for external peer review, particularly to properly contextualize papers for RSAP’s stylistic considerations and to maximize its impact for RSAP’s audience. The intention of peer review is not to alter the study design. Reviewers will be instructed to check that the study is scientifically credible and ethically sound in its scope and methods, and that there is sufficient detail to instill confidence that the study will be conducted and analyzed properly. RSAP does not guarantee publication of Study Protocol manuscripts. It is expected that the study will have undergone appropriate ethics review prior to submission to RSAP, regardless of funding source. Further, it is expected that protocol manuscripts be submitted prior to completion of data collection and preparation of additional papers. "

For methodological and data publications you can check the journal Data in Brief (Scopus Q2).

https://www.journals.elsevier.com/data-in-brief/