I searched Google, Google Scholar and SciFinder for it, but I couldn't find any answer.

A. Duarte-Ruiz et al. (A. Duarte-Ruiz, T. Müller, K. Wurst and B. Kräutler, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 3709–3714) state that anthracene only forms bis-adducts, where both anthracene molecules don't bind to the same hemisphere of the bucky ball. The closest the two anthracenes get is equatorial. They also identified some tris-adducts.

Following the "not on the same hemisphere"-rule from the bis-adducts I could imagine that there are tetra-, penta- or even hexa-adducts of anthracene and fullerene, but I couldn't find any literature reports. For smaller substituents (like 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene) these adducts are already known.

If they don't exist: What may be the reason? Are the anthracene molecules to bulky? Or are the higher adducts between anthracene and fullerene unstable (mono-, bis- and tris-adducts decompose slowly)?

Similar questions and discussions