I am seeing a number of ‘Discussions’ posted that are simply the synopsis of a published paper by the author (or one of the authors) of that paper. Often a response of ‘Impressive’ is seen in the Answers section. For example:

Https://www.researchgate.net/post/Exploring_SrFe12O19_NiFe2O4_Nanocomposites_A_Leap_in_GreenSynthesis

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Tailoring_magnetic_and_dielectric_properties_of_SrFe12O19_NiFe2O4_ferrite_nanocomposites_synthesized_in_presence_of_Calotropis_gigantea_crownflower

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Erbium_Substitution_in_X-Type_Hexaferrites_Unveiling_Structural_and_Magnetic_Dynamics

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Investigation_on_structural_hysteresis_Moessbauer_properties_and_electrical_parameters_in_X-type_Ba2Co2ErxFe28-xO46_hexaferrites3

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Exciting_findings_on_SrFe12O19_NiFe2O4_nanocomposites_synthesised_using_Calotropis_gigantea_extract

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Effect_of_calcination_temperature_on_structural_and_magnetic_properties_of_lightly_lanthanum_substituted_M-type_strontium_cobalt_hexaferrites7

These seem to be of a similar theme and all from the same group at Nirma University.

Is this gaming the system when there is no discussion to be had or answers to be given?