Different rates in different locations show a tendency for sea level rise. Stricter rates other softer ones. Either way they show a rise which will take a lot of trouble to the coastal areas.
Absolutely yes! This is so because some of the impacts can be mitigated, and it is therefore best that the mitigation measures put in place are informed by knowledge.
Climate Change is threat in low line areas and rise in sea can be dangerous for poor coastal communities. Part of this is natural.
The man-made Delta erosion and sea intrusion due to stoping fresh water flow to sea is causing regular harm to coastal area and mangroves. This need to be checked and controlled.
One at that we have recently been exploring is the potential impact of climate based changes in the supply chain. We have looked at drought, flood, and sea level change. If your supply chain has a critical point at a single location, AND that location is at sea level +4 feet, you can expect minor storms to cause inconvenience or far worse interruptions in your ENTIRE supply chain. How do you manufacture the final product if the entire stock of one component is wiped out or stopped in production? If the manufactory is safely above storm surge damage, is the road in (for employees to get to work)? Is the road (or rail or pier) out so you can move the material to the next tier in the supply chain?
Of course it is necessary to study sea level rise. It is far more insidious than thinking "well sea level can rise, and I can move inland....no big deal." Climate models show dire consequences in the far field, but actual consequences can occur right now.
Off course! It is necessary to study of environmental impacts on rising issue of Sea level rise. We are undoubtedly ensuring it is due to climate change. If we will study on this issue for various dimensions with high level scientific research we can assume other environmental impacts can associated them.