Is architecture a product of a person’s fear of something specific?
When fear is not in the emergence of architecture: Was the first human dealing with building architecture in order to protect against the danger of animals?
So he made the door, and out of the hot and cold air, he made windows. A person is afraid of something and gives a certain measure in it, and these enter into the human area, And fear here is evidence of the existence of architecture.
And when an architectural movement appears, what it aims at in meeting certain requirements regarding technological or social developments, and it is a reason for the emergence of the pioneers of the old architecture movement that confronts the technological (as something new) or that the new is derived from the old.
I think that the architect is inhabited by fear, so while in the past he was afraid of predators and of brutal enemies, then he is currently afraid of being accused of being traditional or reactionary . The question remains: How does the architect regain his reassurance?!
First of all, architecture is art. Does it coward creates art? You can hide in a castle or a cave, but it is not the same to create them. Architecture is not a thing but quality. Quality cannot be hidden, but you can only fake it. Does fear create values?
At the very first acquaintance with the question of the role of emotions in architecture, its theory and history, the apparent lack of interest in the emotional impact of architecture in many professional works is striking. Especially rarely do works on the history and theory of architecture concern emotions.
It seems that the more serious the work, the less space is given to feelings.
Architecture, as a representation of modernity, becomes from the architect's modern mind. If so, Freud, as thinker inside the man's modern mind, has the answer.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Design
- Architecture