while recruting university teaching professionals which indicators must be used? How to select the best teacher for your faculty or for your department?
I think the main indicators are innovative teaching-learning , excellent research and very good services for university and society. In addition, Professional development activities and good cooperate life.
BTW Mr Yogesh Sinha, are you guiding Mr Dinesh kumar Saini because you both belong to Sohar University?
Again, Mr Jabar H. Yousif saying Thank you Dr Yogesh for sharing a very useful link. The dissertation disused and presented the Performance Indicators very well. is also from Sohar University
I do acknowledge your paper must be good as says: Nurul Hidayati · Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta : Thank you Dr Yogesh... your paper is very good!
Actually the dissertation is from Paul J. Ballard
I congratulate and thank you for sharing and recommending this piece.
I also congratulate and second you from taking up such an important subject for your study and can sure be available for help if any.
i am dean of the faculty and i done my Ph.D. from TIFR- BITS Pilani long back, Thank you very much for your concern sir. i am preparing API matrics validation model because UGC india using API for universities.
Thank you very for informative discussion. We all agreed that the subject is important. and the discussion here to share our ideas. So, What is the hindrance , if we are in the same or different institute. I think this will not change any thing in the matter . I said for Dr. Yoghosh , thank you for sharing the link of dissertation (Paul J. Ballard). Moreover, you are most welcome to share us your ideas and comments. Please share with us any questions that you asked,
Outcomes (grades, jobs, publications, patents, books, projects, revenue or benefits) are obtained through the transformation of input (student, industry, society) by a
faculty within the facilities provided. The performance evaluation matrix for a faculty needs to account for the mix of activities (teaching, research, consultancy) that is assigned to him (as pointed out by Ian Sir and link provided by Yogesh Sir).
Indicators/weights for 'true effort' (input-output differential or value addition from a given facility) and 'time' are needed. For 'time' we need weights for consistency, learning, etc., that needs to be integrated into the evaluation matrix.
For selecting the best faculty, the true value so obtained needs to be weighed against the need of the department (its KPIs).
I complement Rajesh Raghunathan for having observed the various roles and responsibilities a teacher has to chip in [ The performance evaluation matrix for a faculty needs to account for the mix of activities (teaching, research, consultancy) that is assigned to him: Raghunathan]; some of which are value adding for society, some for the organisation, some for himself.
The division and priorities are distributed disparately. This is subject to ones attribution, alignment or value system.
I tried to count the various roles the academic has to play in an institute:
Thareja, P. (2013). The Roster of a Teacher’s Quality. OmniScience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 2(3), 1-12.
i agree with you the major component is teaching, reserch and services but the problem is accorss the disciplines bringing uniformity in matrics is problems. For example medicine and chemistry journals have very high impact factors then engineering, some discipilines have very low publishers and publications so how to bring uniformity at matics level so that we can apply API uniformally. UGC is calculating API but some discipline it is not applicable or not suitable but for some discipline it is ok.
i agree with you the major component is teaching, reserch and services but the problem is accorss the disciplines bringing uniformity in matrics is problems