Interested in 2021 ideas on paradigm evolution, and binding socio-environmental ]stainability gap pressures and socio-environmentally friendliness as a survival tool?
Have you ever read this article?
Muñoz, Lucio, 2021. Sustainability thoughts 147: How to link the general paradigm evolution model to the pure capitalism model when capitalism is under binding socio-environmental sustainability gap pressures? The case of socio-environmental fixes and socio-environmental patches to save capitalism through socio-environmental friendliness, In: International Journal of Business Management and Economic
Review(IJBMER) ISSN: 2581-4664, July-Aug 2021, Volume 4, Issue 4, Pp. 343-355, India.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353907051_Sustainability_thoughts_147_How_to_link_the_general_paradigm_evolution_model_to_the_pure_capitalism_model_when_capitalism_is_under_binding_socio-environmental_sustainability_gap_pressures_The_case_of_?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6ImhvbWUiLCJwYWdlIjoic2VhcmNoIiwicHJldmlvdXNQYWdlIjoicXVlc3Rpb24ifX0
I haven't read a specific article with that exact title or phrasing, but it sounds like you're referring to recent discussions around the evolution of sustainability paradigms—particularly how socio-environmental sustainability pressures are reshaping organizational strategies and identities.
In 2021, several scholars explored ideas like:
Paradigm evolution from traditional CSR toward deep sustainability integration (e.g., embedding sustainability into core business models, not just peripheral efforts).
The concept of “survival through sustainability”, where firms adopt pro-social and eco-friendly behaviors not just ethically, but as a response to legitimacy threats, consumer demand, and regulatory shifts.
Frameworks linking sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI) with competitive advantage, positioning sustainability as a strategic necessity rather than a compliance issue.
For example now a days consumers have a fad of using recycled packings and products
Send me full name and author of article and publication details and shall be able to add more specific details for you
Rajendra, the title of article and its link in researchgate is below the question, for those who missed it or did not hear about it. It has an outside the box look at the same sustainability issues.... you may find it interesting as those thoughts could be used to disable or improve other approaches including CSR approaches...
Check it when you have time...
Respectfully yours:
In 2021, paradigm shifts emphasized integrating socio-environmental sustainability with core business goals through circular economy models, stakeholder capitalism, ESG investing, and systemic innovation, addressing growing pressure to close gaps between sustainability rhetoric and actual impact.
Chuck, thank you for commenting. If you read the article you will see all possible science based paradigm evolution paths available to capitalism under socio-environmental sustainability pressures, you will see that GOING CIRCULAR ECONOMY IS NOT THERE as it is not a science based appraoch to address SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES.
I appreciate the time if took to comment.
you may find my paper labelling going circular AS THE THIRD DEVELOPMENT THINKNING BLUNDER SINCE 1987.
Sustainability Thought 200: From linear pollution markets to circular pollution markets: Pointing out the third major blunder in terms of development thinking and critical socio-environmental problem solving
Article Sustainability Thought 200: From linear pollution markets to...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science
- Research Topics