In fact, why didn't Einstein imagine a right triangle where it would be possible to put velocities on its sides instead of distances? In fact, if he had drawn this new right triangle, what would he put on each of the sides of the triangle? Is there a new speed, apart from v and c, that he absolutely did not imagine and that would open the way to enormous possibilities for his theory of special relativity?
Please, those who try to keep things as they are and who do not want post-Einstein theories, ABSTENTION.
Dear Jamil: I know that the triangle has magnitudes of energy as seen in the Pythagorean addition of energy: E^2 = (mC^2)^2 + (pC)^2. The extreme right term is the kinetic energy in 3D and the left side is the total energy. The middle term is known as the mass energy mC^2 which can be seen as the kinetic energy in the 4th dimension. Note that energy is a scalar and its addition of different energies will be straight and not vectorial. Only energy of the same "family" will be added vectorially as done by pC (SQRT[(pxC)^2 + (pyC)^ + (pzC)^2]; so, the mC^2 is interpreted as the kinetic speed at the 4thD by a novel theory of space (attached below). This new approach will present that the angular momentum of this 3D and 4th D oscillation corresponds to the spin, which is also added vectorially with 3D angular momentum (J = L + S). This approach is new and groundbreaking. I´ll let you some drawings that reveals Lorentz contraction and dilation from this triangle and the reference to this novel theory. I hope it will inspire in your research, regards.
Jose Oreste Mazzini,
A right triangle on which we place speeds leads in my opinion to a new formula for the Lorentz factor better adapted to physics. My preprint on RG relating to the present question is entitled: "Time dilation as an intrinsic property of light explaining the constancy of the speed of light regardless of the frame of reference from which it is measured".
My present question does not aim to apply the rule of the right triangle to express c' as a function of v and c, according to my scheme, but it is about finding a new "parameter" of physics forgotten by Einstein in his theory of special relativity. In other words, in my opinion, Einstein only revealed fifty percent of reality. Special relativity is not complete. The post-Einstein theory must therefore indeed exist, that is the subject of my question.
Dear Jamil, I´ve just read your preprint and now understand your speed triangle. From that only view, it is indifferent to make smaller the value of c´ or the value of "to" (time at the moving inertial frame). But you need to take into account the other implications. For example, the value of energy; when some object is observed from outside at speed V, it has two energies, the mC^2 and the kinetic one 1/2 mV^2 (at non-relativistic speed). This is expressed in the Planck-Einstein 1st quantum equation, which implies that the energy h/t + kinetic = h/to. In other words, a reduced "to" will give a greater energy equal to the sum of its initial mass energy plus the kinetic one. This discrete energy hv = h/t (t = Planck´s periodicity time) is managed as the same by relativity and by quantum mechanics (QM). The equation doesn´t involve the speech C, it only involves Planck´s constant h and its periodic time. As you can see, reducing time has more implications. By the way, the 4th dimension in this novel theory of space is considered as C*tau (tau = to = Planck´s periodic time). This new way of understanding the 4th dimension has much more implications and joining points between relativity and QM than the Minkowski interpretation that "t" is the event time. C*tau is the wavelength of energy and by that, energy is linked with time-space-mass as revealed by Lorentz. You can read more about this in the previous attachment, regards
Dear Jose Oreste Mazzini,
This triangle that I drew where I put speeds represents the after special relativity in the real sense of the term, by applying the rule of the right triangle it results in a second formula for the Lorentz factor but honestly I did not put my formula for c' because it appears in my article currently. FOR ME THE FATE OF PHYSICS IS PLAYED ON THIS VALUE OF c'. IT IS THE OTHER HALF PEAR THAT EINSTEIN IS MISSING TO BUILD THE PHYSICS OF EVERYTHING.
Dear Jose Oreste Mazzini,
This triangle that I drew where I put speeds represents the after special relativity in the literal sense of the term, by applying the rule of the right triangle it gives a second formula for the Lorentz factor but honestly I did not put my formula for c' because it appears in my article currently being reread by the reviewers in a physics journal. FOR ME THE DESTINY OF PHYSICS IS PLAYED ON THIS VALUE OF c'. IT IS THE OTHER HALF PEAR THAT EINSTEIN IS MISSING TO BUILD THE PHYSICS OF EVERYTHING.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics