If phenotypic revolutions occurred from proteins, to RNA and finally DNA, then is aging a counter phenotypic revolution?

Aging probably is a counter phenotypic revolution because it results from scratches on epigenome. Epigenetic information is usually carried by the suspected past rulers, RNA then proteins.

References:

"We do know that the previous life form used a molecule called RNA as its genetic material"(page 12).

"We tend to assume they were small, because the only survivors of this previous life form are the microscopic RNA viruses, but in truth, we have no idea" (page 12).

"In addition to the few RNA viruses that were left alive, DNA seems to have recycled the RNA molecules into tools that cannot reproduce on their own. In other words, DNA literally sterilized RNA and put it to good use. And we too will be sterilized if we refuse to learn from these past events" ( page 12).

"The information transfers that occur between DNA, RNA and proteins during the production of new proteins are referred to as the “dogma of biology.” Each of these molecules is converted into the molecule of the next step according to what we call the genetic code" ( page 13).

“The Revolutionary Phenotype: The Amazing Story of How Life Begins and How It Ends: Gariépy, J. -F., Éditions, Élora: 9781729861561: Amazon.com: Books.” A.co, December 7, 2018, a.co/d/bAS26cI. Accessed 18 Aug. 2024.

Me: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382330574_Deducing_ITOA's_Veracity

‌