Seeking insights from the research community on the correlation between systematic research methodologies and the accuracy of results. How does the systematic implementation of research processes contribute to the reliability of findings? Share your experiences, perspectives, and any relevant studies that explore the relationship between systematic approaches and the precision of research outcomes. Open to discussions on best practices and challenges encountered in maintaining accuracy through systematic research. Your expertise and contributions will contribute to a broader understanding of the impact of methodological rigor on the quality of research outputs.
I'd say (actually Dr. Deming, a PhD physicist and quality guru) said "there is no true value of any measurement". Even a simple task of measuring how long a piece of paper is will result in different measurements depanding upon the person doing the measurement and the tool used for the measurement. How much do you weigh? Even that flucuates throughout the day. One last example - tell some school children to count how many animals are ina box of animal crackers. One literal answer is zero (there are no animals) but even in counting crackers - here is the head of a cow, here is the body. Is that one aninmal or two?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics