Open-access publishing allows unrestricted access to research papers online, free of charge to the reader. This model of publishing has gained popularity in recent years due to its ability to increase the visibility and impact of research, as well as promote collaboration and innovation. Many open-access journals require authors to pay a fee to cover publication costs, but some are subsidized by institutions or governments.
On the other hand, traditional publishing involves submitting papers to journals that require payment for access, either by individuals or institutions. This model has been the standard for many years and is still widely used, particularly by established journals in certain fields.
Both open-access and traditional publishing models have their pros and cons, and the decision to choose one over the other may depend on factors such as the availability of funding, target audience, and impact goals. Ultimately, the choice should be based on the specific needs and goals of the researcher and the field of study.
I think it should be open access because everyone knows the importance of open access than that of traditional besides it varies fron journal to journal. It is also seen, some open access journals make authors pay.