We are preparing an article, which contains several variables and tables presenting many beta values. The tables also contain many significant interactions. However, the used table type only reports significant betas. The reported beta values for interactions may be confusing for the reader, as there is no immediately clear interpretation for them, other than they are significant. We are making figures for the most important interaction-effects, but I am still unsatisfied to the tables, as I think some readers may find it confusing. Explaining all of the interactions verbally is also confusing for the reader.

Are there any ideas how to better and especially more understandably report the interactions?

Similar questions and discussions