Conducting empirical legal research in Indonesia, especially involving government institutions, is a complex process due to several factors. Firstly, bureaucratic hurdles can cause delays as securing necessary approvals is often time-consuming. Secondly, the diverse legal landscape in Indonesia, with its blend of customary, religious, and civil law, requires deep understanding of local regulations. Thirdly, issues related to data accessibility and reliability can pose significant challenges, with cultural, linguistic, and regional variations further complicating data collection.

This condition create a huge population of legal researcher in Indonesia only conducting judicial normative research that often limits the depth and breadth of the findings. This predominantly normative approach potentially overlooks crucial socio-legal dynamics, which may further hinder the advancement and applicability of Indonesian legal studies.

Similar questions and discussions