The "fixed load" is modeled in PSCAD as a function of voltage and frequency. It is a ZIP load model in which the user is given freedom to choose the portion of each type (Z,I,and P) in the load model. When the user wants the load to be a constant power type by choosing dP/dV = 0, the load will remain constant power type (non-linear) for the voltage between 0.8-1.2 pu. Whereas, for the voltages outside this range, the load behaves as a constant impedance type. This is true and well-observed for a balanced 3-phase voltage. However, for an unbalanced voltage (obtained by creating an unbalanced fault), the behavior of load is unpredictable. Also, I couldn't find any documentation on this. My understanding and observations are as follows:

  • When the voltage at phase-A is less than 0.8 pu, and other phase voltages are normal, the load is supposed to draw a current that a constant impedance load would draw at phase-A, and the load is supposed to draw a constant power type current in other phases (B and C). But, based on my observation, load is not doing so.
  • OR, maybe, whenever one of the phases experiences a voltage drop, the load should draw current in all phases that a constant impedance load would draw. My observation is that, when I take measurements of currents and voltages at each phase of the load, the ratio V/I is the same for all three phases, which implies a constant impedance load. However, the ratio V/I is not equal to the impedance of the load based on nominal power and voltage ratings. Furthermore, this ratio V/I changes with terminal Voltage.

It would be a great help if you could provide me with the explanation about how this model of load behaves on unbalanced disturbance. Thank you.

More Dol Raj Kunwar's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions