It depends on how the holy Scripture is composed in the first place. Is it allowed to change a former version for a latter one. Are they identical. Do people understand that this is a changed version. What was meant in the first version and so on. In case everyone would understand every scripture directly we would not need those who had to study 6 years to get already a basic understanding.

It depends on how the holy Scripture is composed in the first place. Is it allowed to change a former version for a latter one. Are they identical. Do people understand that this is a changed version. What was meant in the first version and so on. In case everyone would understand every scripture directly we would not need those who had to study 6 years to get already a basic understanding.

I think that there is no need to explain religious texts for people. Human beings have the ability of understanding what it is written. When people start to provide an exegesis of a text, they try to insert their opinions and spoil the real meaning. Religion is not a science, it is something to believe in.

Sometimes, they do that to fit their lifestyle, thus easing their need to follow the Godly direction which requires special devotion to achieve.

There is surely a need to explain religious text, at least for me. It is so misinterpreted that you can do whatever you like, kill steel, live in sin

The problem is that in most cases discussion diverts from scholastic to propaganda and personal accusation.

Children easily misinterpret what adults say and then think that this is a good deed and God behaves like my father although the adult did not mean that.

Religion texts need to be explained by qualified spiritual teacher who realy live that religion.

Dear Srete Nikolovski

I have a question. Whether spirituality is prerequisite for explanation of religious text or Scholarship is needed?