Hello Alexander, depending on how you read it, your question can be understood in a reductionist way.
In my opinion, the attribution by others in the scientific community of being a valued dialogue partner is less about the criterion of quantity and more about that of quality. Mass alone means little or nothing. Decisive factors are: What attitude you take as a researcher to scientific questions, what new scientific knowledge you offer, what weighing arguments you take into account and, last but not least, what surprising problem-solving perspectives you articulate. Much else - like pure click numbers - remains rather on the surface of a serious scientific debate.