Dear Wosene Gebreselassie Abtew ,

Artificial intelligence cannot be considered as an author in articles. Experimenters should add references and avoid AI-generated content. AI content must be checked for bias, plagiarism, and inaccuracies. The academic community must develop clear copyright guidelines for ethical AI use.

With the growing integration of AI-powered tools like ChatGPT in academic exploration and publishing, both openings and challenges arise. While artificial intelligence (AI) can help experimenters in drafting, recapitulating, and refining content, it also presents ethical, legal, and scholarly enterprises that must be addressed [

https://pubrica.com/academy/citation-and-formatting/challenges-of-ai-in-research-and-publication/#:~:text=Artificial%20intelligence%20cannot%20be%20considered,guidelines%20for%20ethical%20AI%20use.

Regards,

Shafagat

The integration of AI into research report writing presents significant challenges to the integrity of researchers. While AI can enhance efficiency and provide valuable insights, it also raises concerns about plagiarism, authorship, and the authenticity of data interpretation. Researchers may be tempted to rely too heavily on AI-generated content, potentially leading to a lack of critical thinking and original thought. Furthermore.

The ease of text generation can blur the lines between collaboration and dependence, challenging ethical standards of academic integrity. Therefore, maintaining a balance between using AI as a tool and preserving the core values ​​of research integrity is crucial.

Nowadays we have observed that so many researchers depend on AI in writing their reports or papers, it is very useful in getting different ideas and provide valuable insights and that may help researchers improve their writing, but not forget that researchers should use their critical thinking and not relying extremely on AI in academic writing and whatever they wrote should be avoided from any plagiarism