China cut fertilizer use and still increased crop yields. This is how they did it

📷Farmers have saved a total of $12.2bn by increasing their yield whilst using less fertilizerImage: REUTERS/Stringer

26 Mar 2018

UpLink - Take Action for the SDGs

📷

Take action on UpLink📷

Most Popular

📷COVID-19: What you need to know about the coronavirus pandemic on 7 June Joe Myers 07 Jun 2021

📷The challenge for G7 leaders: vaccinate the world and be bolder on climate Paul Polman 11 Jun 2021

📷COVID-19: What you need to know about the coronavirus pandemic on 10 June Joe Myers 10 Jun 2021

More on the agenda📷

Forum in focus

The one essential element needed to accelerate action on climate change

📷

Read more about this project📷

📷Explore context

China

📷

Explore the latest strategic trends, research and analysis📷

Millions of Chinese farmers are reaping the benefits of a massive agricultural study, which has helped them increase their crop yields whilst reducing the use of fertilizer.

Specific, evidence-based recommendations were made to 21 million Chinese farmers over a decade, offering them detailed advice about which variety of crop to use, exactly the best time to plant, how many seeds to sow and how much fertilizer to use.

The detailed guidance led to an increase in the amount of maize, wheat and rice produced, with crop yields increasing at an average of 11%.

Meanwhile, fertilizer use was reduced by an average of 15% per crop, saving 1.2 million tonnes of nitrogen, according to the study published in Nature.

And the combination of greater yields and less fertilizer led to total economic savings of $12.2bn for the farmers.

The study is of huge importance to those looking at the future of sustainable agriculture and how the world will produce enough food for the rising population. It also points to the way in which science can improve agriculture.

📷The use of fertilizers around the world is growingImage: FAO

Cross-border cooperation

However, it may not be easy to replicate the results elsewhere.

The scale of the project was vast and required a significant investment of both manpower and money which would be hard for other developing countries to replicate.

The farmers were convinced to change their practices as a result of 14,000 workshops, on-site demonstrations and outreach programmes. This was achieved with the help of more than 1,000 researchers, 65,000 bureaucrats and technicians as well as 140,000 representatives from agriculture businesses.

China’s centrally-controlled government is capable of implementing policies across the whole country, unlike many sub-Saharan African countries.

“It would clearly have benefits across sub-Saharan Africa, but an approach is needed that crosses borders, organizations and funders,” Leslie Firbank, Professor of Sustainable Agriculture at Leeds University told Nature.

Cutting back

📷Fertilizer consumption has grown in Asia faster than any other part of the worldImage: FAO

The success in China is also partially due to its history of over-use of fertilizers, as it has strived to produce enough food to keep pace with population growth.

Chinese farmers use an average of 305 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare per year – more than four times the global average. China has been a significant contributor to the world’s increased use of fertilizers, and Asia’s fertilizer consumption has grown faster than any other part of the world.

This has serious consequences for the environment as well as for agriculture.

Fertilizers such as nitrogen often end up in water sources, and contribute to the acidification of soil.

They also cause global warming, causing soil microbes to emit unexpectedly high levels of nitrous oxide. Nitrous oxide is a greenhouse gas with 300 times as much heat-trapping power as carbon dioxide.

📷Less fertilizer use also helps reduce climate changeImage: Nature

The UN’s Food and Agricultural Organization predicted that global fertilizer use would grow by 1.4% each year between 2014 and 2018, with China accounting for 18% of that growth.

The report into the experiment notes that the Chinese farmers needed some convincing about the evidence before changing their normal farming methods.

Seeing the increased crop production should now give the Chinese farmers the incentive they need to cut back on fertilizer use.

And the wider community can learn from what happens when scientific evidence guides farming practices.

Now the article says that fertilizer is cut and the yields increased. Yet from 2009 to the date the fertilizer per acre went from 160 kg/ha to 299 kg/ha.

People need to be more honest in the presentation but according to the article we can clearly see that fertilizer uage was not cut but rather was increased.

Now if that is certain I do believe they were effective in increasing yield and not because of the fertilizer being cut.

It is clear possible to get exemplary yields while minimizing fertilizer input but in this case we more hyple and less proof of the actual assertion.

Total food grain production of China is always more than India, production of Fertilizers is also more in China no Import, in India not sufficient Fertilizers production import to other country, China per capita income is more than India.

In 2021 Nominal GDP per capita ($)India is 2,191 while GDP capita (Int. $)China is 18,931.

Since 2004, subsidies increased by 670 percent in the Chinese fertilizer industry to reduce the farmer's burden

In terms of absolute level Chinese yield per hectare in most crops, of course, exceeds that of India by a significant margin, but this has been true for quite a long time in the past. In provision of inputs like organic and inorganic fertilizers and irrigation water the Chinese performance has been much better than that of India. Both countries have devoted not a very low proportion of their total gross investment to the agricultural sector. But the effectiveness of this investment has been quite unsatisfactory on account of, among other things, technical deficiencies and faulty planning in both countries, and the excesses of over enthusiastic but unskilled party cadres in China and a very much restricted framework of village institutions and administrative setup in India. In land policy much of the period under consideration was taken up in China in bold experimentations--with the inevitable advances and retreats--in search of the optimum size of land management in a backward peasant economy, while in India in spite of copious land.

In last ,The china spread Corona.So there is no comparision

Hi. I hope the following bullettin

Could help you:

http://www.fao.org/3/a0443e/a0443e.pdf

Sir, I can assume because of the better economic condition of farmers of China and better extension education to farmers , they adopted recommended fertilizer use or higher fertilizer use earlier compared to India.

In India, especially Eastern India farmers are still reluctant to apply recommended dose .Hesitation for early high investment is one of the major reason of low application among small ,marginal and tenant farmers.MSP also can be a factor.