The interpretation and translation of politically charged words like "freedom" and "justice" are deeply shaped by the political context, historical background, and ideological perspectives of the societies in which they are used. These terms do not have fixed, universal meanings; instead, they are fluid and often contested, reflecting the power structures and cultural narratives of a given era. For example, in a democratic society, "freedom" may be associated with individual rights, free speech, and electoral participation, while in an authoritarian regime, it might be framed in terms of national security, collective unity, or state-defined liberties. Similarly, "justice" can mean retributive justice (punishment for wrongdoing) in one legal system, while in another, it may emphasize restorative justice, focusing on reconciliation and rehabilitation. The political context also affects translation; in propaganda or legal discourse, words may be deliberately framed to align with state ideology or social movements, influencing public perception. Global conflicts, colonial histories, and ideological divides further complicate how such terms are understood and translated across different languages and cultures. Ultimately, political context dictates how "freedom" and "justice" are interpreted, revealing the subjective nature of language and its role in shaping governance, policy, and social identity.