Dear Friends,
I have been facing subtle racism, bias, and prejudice from researchers in academic institutions and organizations that are funded by taxpayers of the USA. I am a naturalized citizen of the USA, born and raised in India (Asian Indian by ethnicity).
I have been struggling for over a year to bring to light fundamental flaws in the core principles of Computer Science and Software Engineering, which if exposed will lead to a scientific and technological revolution. Only to be snubbed by sarcastic and patronising comments, which are the result of thinly veiled racism and prejudice.
After having sent dozens of emails and notices for months, I sent the attached email (to GAO.gov, NSF.gov, DoE.gov, and DoD.gov) to expressly report the subconscious and thinly vailed racism and prejudice or racial bias.
I have declaratively stated many times that I am willing to face criminal prosecution if I am wrong in my claims about subverting a dominant paradigm. I am certain that it is a violation of the law and of my civil rights if government officials ignore allegations of racism or racial bias.
If they feel that their actions were not racially prejudiced, they are obligated to deny such allegations in writing. Is it not a breakdown of the system and a violation of the law when responsible people ignore and suppress allegations of violation of the law? They have violated the law - it has earned me the right to protest before their office buildings, in open forums and to take the appropriate action under law.
If anyone were to accuse me of racism in performing my official duties, I would have to respond in writing as to why my professional conduct and actions are not racism. If I do not respond and continue to treat them in the same manner, it is no longer merely subconscious prejudice or subtle racial bias.
If a person of colour makes such an allegation to the supervisor of an employee, doesn’t the supervisor have a legal obligation to investigate the allegations? Of course, the employee and the supervisor have the right to file a case if the allegation is untenable. Ignoring or supressing allegation of racism is tacit protection of racism.
I sent the attached email about a week ago and have not received any response, so I intend to escalate this to the next level, which may be to approach the courts of law or social organizations that support the efforts against racism. Any suggestions of social organizations such as NAACP to help in my fight against racism?
The attached PDF has a few emails that I sent to leaders of the foremost academic organizations of the 21st century that are funded by taxpayers of the USA to promote science and technology. It feels like I'm having to spoon-feed the basics of science and scientific principles to high school students rather than to senior scientists of academic institutions.
One doesn’t need a doctorate in science to know the simple fact that it is a grave mistake to acquire scientific knowledge (objective knowledge or facts about the nature of physical things that unquestionably fall under the realm of science) by rejecting and violating scientific principles (proven rules and core principles of the scientific method).
What is scientific knowledge? Scientific knowledge includes knowledge about nature and facts, such as the essential properties to be able to understand the objective reality of physical things (such as viruses, animals, trees, molecules, bacteria, components, and neurons).
It is essential to acquire scientific knowledge about the novel coronavirus to be able to invent a cure for Covid-19. It is essential to acquire scientific knowledge about components to be able to invent real software components and achieve real CBD/CBE for software (e.g. for solving software crisis).
It is essential to acquire scientific knowledge about neurons to be able to emulate neurons in software and build software neural networks to invent computer intelligence. It is impossible to acquire such essential scientific knowledge by rejecting and violating the principles of science.
Is it possible to acquire useful valid scientific knowledge (e.g. about nature and essential properties of components of neurons) by rejecting and violating scientific principles? This explains why those problems stood unsolved for decades.
I wonder how history will judge leaders (who may be blinded by prejudice or racism) of the foremost academic organizations of the 21st century that are funded by taxpayers of the USA to promote science and technology and yet refuse to acknowledge even the simple fact that it is a grave mistake to reject and violate basic scientific principles in acquiring scientific knowledge (about components or neurons).
Although I strongly oppose looting and vandalism, I have always supported peaceful protests against racism such as the injustice mooted for George Floyd and many others. It is time for decent and well-intentioned people to introspect and sincerely analyse if subconscious racial bias and prejudice are affecting their professional conduct. We all have subconscious bias and prejudice, but we are legally and morally obligated to ensure that it does not affect our professional conduct. Ignoring and supressing allegations of racial bias is tacit admission of racism.
In my view, debt-ridden democratic nations are facing their biggest existential threat since World War II. The hidden agenda of CPC (Communist Party of China) poses a far bigger threat than the USSR ever did for democracy. The new Cold War will be won by the side that sustains faster economic growth. I feel helpless due to the racism at taxpayer-funded organizations that is handicapping the USA.
China’s US$25 trillion-dollar GDP (in terms of Purchasing Power Parity or PPP) is the highest in the world and allows it to make the largest investments in the research and technology workforce with long-term central planning (which directs the whole industry to work for the end goal of global domination), putting it in a far better position to win the economic war unless the West can counter it by inventing and leveraging (exclusively by protecting from theft) new and revolutionary technologies.
China is also investing trillions of dollars in the strategic acquisition of assets, natural resources, trojan horses in western universities and trade routes of developing countries, both on land and sea. One of the advantages of being a command economy is that the CPC can define long-term objectives and steer corporations, banks, and other lending institutions to align their objectives with those of the CPC.
The CPC can confiscate the wealth and assets of its citizens to achieve its objectives. The CPC can assure profitability of corporations through direct or indirect subsidies, such as by devaluing currency (and, in effect, reducing salaries and interest burden in real terms). For instance, Jack Ma is a member of the CPC and has said that he would surrender his wealth to the CPC if asked (as if he has a choice).
The stated goal of Xi Jinping is to make China a tech superpower by 2025 under its Thousand Talents Program. It is an admirable goal, but the methods they have employed are disgraceful and disturbing – theft of intellectual property, cyber espionage, hacking of technology companies, corrupt and coerced technology transfers, and theft by instilling trojan horses in research centres.
The CPC is engaged in the economic subversion of free markets by employing theft of technologies and intellectual property, blackmail, strategic funding of technology companies in the West, and eliminating competition by illegal trade practices in order to become a monopoly in critical domains such as medicinal APIs and rare-earth elements.
How can democratic nations compete and deal with such foreign threats to national security if free nations supress racial bias and prejudice to stifle academic integrity, creativity, scientific progress, and revolutionary inventions (of coloured people), which are the forte of free people and democracy?
I am willing to face criminal prosecution, if my discoveries and inventions are not valuable in the scientific and technological competition for economic development. I am determined to make my contribution in this hour of need to both the USA and India. How do I fight and expose unlawful racial bias and/or prejudice in academic institutions and organizations that are funded by taxpayers?
Best Regards,
Raju Chiluvuri
Dear Friends,
I wonder how history will judge leaders (who may be blinded by prejudice or racism) of the foremost academic organizations of the 21st century that are funded by taxpayers to promote science and technology and yet refuse to acknowledge even the simple fact that it is a grave mistake to reject and violate basic scientific principles in acquiring scientific knowledge (about components or neurons).
It is a simple obvious fact: It is impossible to acquire useful scientific knowledge by denying and violating proven scientific principles. It feels like I'm having to spoon-feed the basics of science, scientific knowledge and scientific principles to high school students rather than to senior scientists of foremost academic institutions.
What is scientific knowledge? Scientific knowledge includes knowledge about nature and facts, such as the essential properties to be able to understand the objective reality about physical things (such as viruses, animals, trees, molecules, bacteria, components, and neurons). Scientific principles include proven rules and core principles of the modern scientific method that has been evolving and perfected for 400 years by many great philosophers of science.
One doesn’t need a doctorate in science to know the simple fact that it is a grave mistake to acquire scientific knowledge (objective knowledge or facts about the nature of physical things) that unquestionably fall under the realm of science by rejecting and violating scientific principles (proven rules and core principles of modern scientific method that has been perfected by many great philosophers of science).
It is impossible to acquire useful scientific knowledge by denying and violating proven scientific principles. Accepting this fact tantamount to accepting that dominant paradigms for software engineering (that use fake components for CBD/CBE of software) and artificial intelligence (that use fake neurons for neural networks) are fundamentally flawed.
Isn’t it a fact that existing scientific knowledge for software about physical things such as components and neurons has been acquired and accumulated by rejecting and violating scientific method? That is, existing knowledge about so called software components or neurons have no basic in reality or fact.
In fact, the knowledge about so called software components or neurons is in clear contradiction to the facts and reality we know about real physical components (that are used in other engineering paradigms such as mechanical, aerospace or electronic engineering disciplines) or biological neurons respectively.
Any flawed dominant paradigms can be and must be subverted. Subverting a dominant paradigm of a scientific or technological discipline is a quintessential example for a scientific or technological revolution.
Best Regards,
Raju
Dear Dr. Titus Iloduba Eze,
Thank you for your support. I clearly stated that I am willing to face criminal prosecution if I am wrong. I made the following two allegations in writing.
Professionals working for taxpayer organizations have moral and legal obligation to respond when allegation of racial bias is levelled against them.
Professionals working for taxpayer organizations have moral and legal obligation to respond when allegation of subversion of academic integrity and deception is levelled against them.
Ignoring and supressing is tacit admission of guilty. All the universities teaching geocentric paradox of software as a science and technology. They have been indoctrinating young and impressionable students into fake science or geocentric paradox of software (even after clearly informing them many times).
If the 2300-year-old lie (i.e. the Earth is at center) were not yet exposed until today, even the most brilliant scientists born during past 400 years (e.g. Newton, Einstein, Bose, Max Planck, Maxwell, Dirac or Bohr to name a few) could not have made any tangible contribution to basic sciences under crisis (or geocentric paradox), except may be exposing the lie at the root of geocentric paradox. Even the most brilliant researchers would end up wasting their passionate efforts and their brilliance on fools’ errand – Try to make sense of contradiction such as inexplicable retrograde motions and epicycles.
Isn’t it criminal negligence to knowingly ruin such efforts or careers of millions of students by indoctrinating and brainwashing impressionable students (by the educational institutions around the world by force) into such a flawed paradigm (i.e. paradox filled with inexplicable contradictions)? Any student would fail all tests (i.e. can’t graduate), if he/she questions or disagrees with such invalid BoK (Body of Knowledge), which has been acquired and accumulated by relying on the flawed unproven presumptions.
The students may choose career paths such as researchers (e.g. to make sense of inexplicable epicycles), or practitioners of the craft (astronomy or software) by using most inefficient or even flawed solutions invented using invalid-BoK -- Scientific knowledge accumulated by rejecting and violating scientific principles.
Isn’t it a criminal negligence to ruin careers and researcher efforts of young impressionable students by forcefully indoctrinating them into a fake science (or paradox) even after informing many times in no uncertain terms?
What kind of scientist ignores and suppresses such allegations of deception that certainly causes irreparable damage by indoctrinating students into a fake science that harm their career and research efforts?
I am making this allegations openly in public forum and willing to face criminal prosecution, if I am wrong: Isn’t it a crime to knowingly teach young impressionable students flawed scientific knowledge that has been accumulated by rejecting and violating scientific principles?
Best regards,
Raju
Dear Friends,
Each paradigm for a major field has a certain set of core guiding principles (underlying tenets and axioms) in its foundation.
It is impossible to learn valid knowledge for comprehending the paradigm by not knowing and violating the foundational core principles (underlying tenets and axioms).
It is impossible to gain valid knowledge for an economic discipline by rejecting and violating core economic principles.
It is impossible to gain valid knowledge for a legal discipline by rejecting and violating core legal principles.
Likewise, the paradigms for capitalism and communism have certain sets of core guiding principles to define value systems such as freedom, property rights, equality, and collective ownership.
It is impossible to solve certain major problems in software (e.g. infamous software crisis or real computer intelligence) without acquiring valid scientific knowledge.
It is impossible to gain useful valid scientific knowledge for solving the problems by rejecting and violating scientific principles. Those problems stood unsolved for decades and would stay unsolved until this grave error is accepted.
Best Regards,
Raju
All.shades of opinion must be balaned to determine the truth on which.we must stand.all.the time
Dear Friends,
Can you find any other explanation other than subtle prejudice or racism, for the acts of ignoring, supressing or even sabotaging the following fundamental discoveries of an Indian origin researcher that can usher in a scientific revolution?
China has been working very hard for decades to become technological superpower by clandestinely stealing technology and intellectual property and it appears to be largely succeeded. What India and the USA can do to counter this loss of huge technological superiority? One way is making those stolen technologies outdated and obsolete by ushering in a new scientific and technological revolutions.
What kind of support, India or USA would provide if discoveries of an Indian can usher in a new scientific and technological revolution that can make the USA and India software technology superpower? Does he treated with basic dignity or force him to seek partnership with foreign competition that could cause irreparable damage to the software industry (the crown jewel of Indian/US economies) by humiliating him?
An Indian researcher made fundamental discoveries that would subvert a major dominant scientific or technological paradigm. No other researcher in the world made such fundamental discovery (e.g. such as the Sun is at the centre) that subverted a major dominant technological or scientific paradigm since the subversion of the major dominant paradigm (known as geocentric paradigm) in 17th century.
It is not hard to draw a picture of an elephant. With few hours training, even a middle-school kid can draw a picture of an elephant, that certainly looks like an elephant (without any doubt or ambiguity). But even a highly talented painter or artist can’t draw a picture of an elephant, if he doesn’t know or clueless about what an elephant is (e.g. is it a kid of tree, building, landmark, animal, bird, fish, flower or body-part of an animal).
Today software community doesn’t know and completely clueless about what is a component (e.g. what is the true essence or useful function of components) and what is meant by CBD/CBE (Component-based design and engineering), in the context of mature and proven engineering paradigms such as mechanical, aerospace and electronics that most certainly use components for building large and complex products.
My request to researchers is just acquire valid knowledge (e.g. accurate description or valid explanation) about what is a physical component (e.g. its true essence) and what is meant by CBD/CBE for physical components (e.g. cars, computers, airplanes, spacecrafts, cell-phones, electronic network-switches or other medical machines) for inventing (e.g. analogous to painting) equivalent components for software.
This kind of knowledge about any kind of physical things (including physical components or neurons) most certainly (without any doubt or ambiguity) falls under the realm of science. It is impossible to gain any such kind of valid scientific knowledge (e.g. valid description, facts, essential concepts, methods, or explanation) by rejecting and violating scientific principles (i.e. proven rules and core-principles of scientific method).
Even if it is simple to draw pictures of elephants (or invent real components for software), it is impossible to draw pictures of elephants by being clueless about what an elephant is (or what is a component in the context of mature engineering paradigms).
If anyone disagrees, it is not hard to prove me wrong: Just show me valid description and facts for physical components and for CBD/CBE for physical products, anywhere in the world. I can’t find any evidence that anyone else in the world even attempted to gain such valid scientific knowledge about the physical components.
Kindly understand this simple argument that fake components, fake neurons, fake science, or fake scientists (who don’t even have elementary understanding about proven scientific principles and incapable of understanding simple logic), can’t usher in technological revolution for solving even simple technological problems.
Instead of giving elaborate list of uses and justification, it is sufficient to say that the components are the greatest industrial engineering artifact or invention of all time (e.g. see GreatestArtifact.pdf). Can anyone name another artifact or invention in the history of industrial engineering that contributed more for increasing quality and productivity than real components for designing & building large or complex products?
P.S: Please see the Youtube video that certainly proves that even a young 4-year-old elephant can be trained to draw a picture of an elephant: https://youtu.be/rQwTMZ8E4j4 or skip near to the end to see the end result: https://youtu.be/rQwTMZ8E4j4?t=144
Even when a young elephant can learn drawing a picture of an elephant and flowers, I do not feel obligated to believe that scientists having doctorate in science are incapable of learning elementary concepts such as what is a science (or scientific discipline), and what is scientific knowledge for understanding what is a component without violating elementary scientific principles?
Inventing software components is not lot more complex than painting a picture of an elephant😊. What other justification is there other than subtle prejudice or racism, for the acts of ignoring, suppressing by snubbing or even sabotaging fundamental discoveries of an Indian origin researcher that can usher in a scientific and technological revolution?
Best Regards,
Raju Chiluvuri
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Waves