Hello everyone,

I am brand new to any molecular dyanmics simulations and am having a difficult time viewing the RMSD results of my MD simulation. What I did for the experiment is I used the QwikMD tool in VMD to modify a residue of our protein, then I planned on observing the RMSD over the time of the simulation. When the simulation finished, I loaded the .qwikmd file into VMD. This file contains the initial structure of the protein, as well as all the .dcd files associated with the simulation. I can view how the backbone changes over time by either using the RMSD Trajectory Tool or the "Easy Run" tab of QwikMD. In both cases, I align the structures to the reference structure and can get it to output a reasonable RMSD for the whole backbone over time. However, whenever I try to tell it to plot the RMSD of the specific amino acid, I get one of two results: either an error message or a plot that shows RMSDs of the amino acid around 40. I figure the RMSD value of 40 cannot be correct because when I calculate the distance between the alpha carbons of the residue in the initial and final structure, there is only about a 2 Å difference.

I have spent all week trying to troubleshoot this and have looked for answers in nearly every single webpage on the subject, but none seem to fix this issue. I have also read the user manuals and VMD mailing list without any luck. My questions for you are:

1) Is it safe to assume something is wrong based on the fact that there is little difference in distance between the two alpha carbons but the RMSDs I am getting are much higher?

2) Could you please walk me through how to correctly specify which amino acid/atom to use and how to specify the reference structure? I believe I am selecting the reference structure correctly, but this could be the issue. I should note that I have tried specifying the atom by using "name CA and resid 53" but that tells me there is a change of 0 RMSD over time.

Thank you in advance for your time.

More Nolan Newman's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions