Dear Prof. John Hodge

I refer you to the following link, where the authors show that an alternative possibility in the wave-particle duality interpretation of the double slit experiment arises by observing bouncing droplets in a vibrating oil bath, a friction physical process [1]

[1] https://hiup.org/quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics/

Pedro L. Contreras E.

Yes. I've also done several interference experiments that reject not only the Copenhagen Interpretation and also wave models of light. Can quantum Mechanics THEORY which uses the Hamiltonian calculate such results. I think not, but that is the why of the question.

Dear Prof. John Hodge

You are right, I am not a specialist in this field, but I think Prof. Heisenberg has a paper where he tried to relate turbulence and QM, wasn´t he?

https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199801/heisenberg.cfm

Pedro L. Contreras E.

The reference says his work was in fluid dynamics of a river. I looked at aerodynamics for turbulent flow and used that approach for modeling the the plenum (aether) in the photon interference simulation with the analogy to aerodynamic fluid flow (but only proportional to first order ). But this is not a Hamiltonian which could be more general if such could be done. But I think modeling the space around moving particles as a gas flow (aerodynamics) is inaccurate because gas has mass - aether/plenum cannot have gravitational mass although it may have inertial mass. This is where I stop with this question.

Thank for the information Prof. John Hodge Regards.