Governance in the open area moves between the impact of the architecture and the output. The first variation in the direction of the architect and its output is derived from its ideas.
The second is in the composition of the product and its difference in the priorities of the principles adopted, the result of which is the weighting of concepts only in the vicinity of the human need and the requirements of the human product.
The existence of perverse or perverse ideas, In the field of research, The existence of perverse or perverse ideas, In the field of research, there is no change in the reality of architecture, either a product that remains or has disappeared, There is no proper text or idea of architecture, because it is an architecture that has been built on foundations in which man has influenced, and his belief and morality have played a role in its clarity and organization.
Architecture may be judged between the equations presented by perceptions and their employment, They are between balance and unbalance, unity and disunity, centralization and decentralization. Architecture does not gain balance, unity and centralization until it is sustained, nor is it documented in the valour of its product, its desire for it or the life of a community in its city.
What do you mean by "human being himself"? Are you addressing humans in general, or you mean humans in direct interaction with a specific place?.. Your question and its description still require more clarification of background and definitions of the terms and expressions you use, otherwise I'm not sure how many people may understand what you're talking about and what exactly your question is.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Design
- Architecture