It may happen that a citation will never appear at ResearchGate. This depends on whether the full text (PDF) of the citing paper is available at RG and whether the citation can be identified by the automated algorithms used by the platform. Unfortunately, there is nothing you can do for this. See also these related discussions:
However, ResearchGate's algorithm rather often fails to identify citations. It is very far from being perfect. In my own uploaded publications, a lot of references have not been identified.
I think that the problem is that according to https://aladabj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/aladabjournal/article/view/4341 your paper Article الحركة النسوية الايرلندية ونشاطها السياسي1880-1914
is indeed cited (it is mentioned in the list of more than 20 references).
However, in the paper Article دور المرأة في الحركة الوطنية الإيرلندية 1900-1916The Role of...
itself it is not (or better the RG search engine (and myself) cannot identify your paper in the references) Can you make a screenshot where in the reference list your paper is cited in de pdf file of this paper?
In general, the problem is that unfortunately or not the algorithms in RG, Google Scholar etc. are not processing Arabic (same goes for Russian, Bulgarian, Chinese etc.) flawless.
If you look at the paper The role of … (here on RG) you can see that only 11 references are more or less recognised. As indicated by Wolfgang R. Dick unfortunately not much can be done about it.
Dear Dr. Rob Celler I have uploaded four images confirming that my paper has indeed been cited. I have included three separate excerpts, in addition to the full list of references, where my full name appears clearly. I do not understand why the citation tracking algorithms on ResearchGate fail to recognize this reference.
Dear Talib Hashim Ati Now I see it is indeed there but apparently impossible to read by the RG algorithm/search engine.
In part I think it is the 'fault' of the journal, 'normally' there is one list most of the time called References (either logically numbered or a list on alphabetical order. In this case it is split into more lists (see for example the enclosed files where one see first a list of 18 publications and then another list. This is confusion for a search engine).
Furthermore as indicated before I am afraid that the full Arabic lettertype (of your name, title of the paper etc.) makes it harder (if not impossible) for the RG algorithm to read it.