As the adoption of AI and machine learning expands in financial services, particularly in credit risk assessment, there is an urgent need to address the ethical, regulatory, and fairness challenges associated with algorithmic decision-making. This is especially critical for thin-file consumers—those with limited or no traditional credit history—where reliance on alternative data (e.g., digital footprints, mobile payments, psychometric indicators) becomes essential.
While AI models offer significant improvements in predictive accuracy, they also risk amplifying biases, lacking transparency, and posing ESG-related challenges, particularly in terms of Social (S) and Governance (G)responsibilities.
This discussion aims to explore methodologies, frameworks, and governance mechanisms that ensure credit scoring models are not only accurate but also ethical, explainable, inclusive, and compliant with emerging AI governance standards and financial regulations.
🎯 Points for Discussion:
🔑 Keywords:
As AI increasingly drives decision-making in financial systems, particularly for credit scoring of underbanked and thin-file consumers, it introduces complex challenges related to fairness, transparency, regulatory compliance, and ESG alignment.
I am interested in discussing methodologies, frameworks, and experiences related to balancing these dimensions in AI-powered credit risk models.
Looking forward to insights, case studies, and collaborative discussions from researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of AI, ethics, governance, and financial technology.