Nope Sorry ,

But, will this help you? You may contact him, he had the same question 2 years ago...

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Seeking_feedback_on_Brunauer-Emmett-Teller_BET_Surface_Area_Analysis_and_Barrett-Joyner-Halenda_BJH_Pore_Size_and_Volume_Analysis_equipment

Thank you Eshani, very helpful link

I was just looking at its manual:

http://www.horiba.com/fileadmin/uploads/Scientific/Documents/PSA/Manuals/SA-9600_software_manual_4.0.pdf

It seems a very simplified adsorption apparatus, which uses flow method instead the the (standard) volumetric method. I could not find which is the minimum adsorption relative pressure (for N2, say) you can measure, but I think is not too low. This is not good in microporous materials such as activated carbons, since most adsorption will occur at very low pressures; then you will miss a lot of information about the porosity of your samples.

I can just consider it is an industrial/high throughput adsorption apparatus which might not be the best for research.

Let's see if other people can provide more information/experiences to complement my quick opinion.

Thank you both Fernando and Darren - I have come to the same conclusions myself with respect to the 9600 series.