Avoiding the shift from perfect traditional market thinking to perfect green market thinking since 2012 RIO +20 has created a deep green market paradigm shift knowledge gap.
Flipping perfect traditional market thinking to imperfect dwarf green market thinking since 2012 to avoid the shift to perfect green markets has created a deep dwarf green market paradigm flip knowledge gap too.
These knowledge gaps are apparently helping those researchers and institutions implementing development under permanent environmental market failure as well as confusing environmental stakeholders on proper place for action and protest as the responsibility of governments, of businesses and of consumers are changed, and even inversed depending on the market in question.
And this raises the question, green market paradigm shift knowledge gaps and dwarf green market paradigm flip knowledge gaps, are they academic tunneling/willful blindness push helpers?
What do you think?
The concepts of "Green Market Paradigm Shift Knowledge Gaps" and "Dwarf Green Market Paradigm Flip Knowledge Gaps" represent critical areas of concern in the context of environmental sustainability and market dynamics. These knowledge gaps signify the disparities in our understanding of the evolving green economy and the challenges it presents.
The "Green Market Paradigm Shift Knowledge Gaps" pertain to the lack of comprehensive insights into the transformative changes occurring in the global economy as it increasingly shifts towards sustainability, eco-friendliness, and renewable resources. Addressing these gaps is crucial for policymakers, businesses, and researchers to harness the potential of this green transition effectively.
On the other hand, "Dwarf Green Market Paradigm Flip Knowledge Gaps" refer to the often overlooked or underestimated aspects within this shift, which could have significant impacts if ignored. They signify a potential blind spot in academia and policymaking, which, if not recognized, might hinder progress toward a truly sustainable global economy.
Both these knowledge gaps underscore the importance of robust research and comprehensive understanding in shaping a more sustainable and environmentally responsible future, ensuring that we do not inadvertently hinder our progress by neglecting critical aspects of the green market paradigm shift.
Baqer, good day. The question is related to if the WIDESPREAD existence of these knowledge gaps helps those using academic tunneling and willful academic blindness to save the status quo, the pollution production market,
If you think it helps them, then why you think so?. If you think it does not help them, then why you think so?.
Remember, for those who do research, that knowledge is out there, but under academic tunneling or willful academic blindness, that means nothing as they have decided to one one way, rain or shine.
Can you please try to answer the question, yes or not, and why and I will reply.
Lucio
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Phytochemistry
- Extracts