NGOs are mainly functioning with Policy norms of the respective Government.

What is the objectives of the NGOs coincide with Government rules and policy for further execution.

The obvious objectives of the NGOs are to help the vulnerable people in the community.

Transparency is one the open tool to expose the clarity of the progress of the scheme or project that is essentially required to measure the output.

The stakeholders analysis and the impact of the projects could help to assess the quality and improvement of the programs.

Moreover, what is the current situation of sustaining the development of the NGOs? and how to raise the funds for functioning of the NGOs could be main concern because the Government may not be able to help the vulnerable households on door to door. That is the case that NGOs are playing the vital role of taking care for the disadvantaged section in the community.

How far the NGOs could help the Government in developing countries? How it can be supported by the Government? How the NGOs can sustain with available funds or external donors support from foreign countries or United Nations Organisations etc?

You are raising some central and sensitive issues that NGOs, large or small, must grapple with. What makes it so difficult is the balance between being truly mission focused, versus flexible enough to take on issues as they become fashionable.

Second, NGOs can "villianize" some individuals or causes again in order to achieve funding from those who are simply opposed to a given topic but don't care that much to be any more informed.

Then there is staffing. An aid organization often has "core" staff, there for a long period, covering many issues, as opposed to specialist staff, working often temporarily, yet wish to stay on, if funds exist, after thier initial grant ends.

Finally, finanical managers are there for their accounting and legal expertise, not necessarily because of the organization's mission. Their view on funding may even be in conflict with the wishes of fund-raising as per thier own way of ensuring the financial audits each year are approved.

Thanks, @Joel, @Senapathy, and @Jaroslav; your points are clear. The fact is for humanitarian aid in the developing countries (Yemen example) where the environments are unstable; the organizations have their funds from entities like USAID, DFID, EU, etc. Messaging the "serving" alone needs to be integrated with fundraising to enable the stakeholders to understand their challenges; at the same time, accountability of funds needs to be increased.

Yes, this statement is more to the point. When speaking of accountability of funds, there are two things that come to mind. First, is the need to have a buget prepared ahead of time for the annual meeting of the advisory board. This should show at the agreed-upon level of spedificty, so that all memebers are satsified, and of course the tally of dollars spent equals to dollars provided.

But secondly, dollars should equal some form/level of impact. In other words, can the donors leave the meeting feeling that they have something tangible to show thier directors for the money invested.