I'm reading an article titled "Scientists Seek Life Across the Multiverse" and it says,
"If the multiverse hypothesis is correct, physicists would no longer have to find explanations for the absurdly improbable fine-tuning of the laws of nature that has made our existence possible. We are just lucky to live in a good universe among many different ones. One universe fine-tuned for life is an unlikely fluke. But one habitable universe among many is to be expected."
Another way of phrasing this is - Scientists are so eager to avoid any notion of Intelligent Design of the cosmos that they're willing to deny Earth's own scientific potential ... and their own intelligence.
Evolution can be observed in the form of adaptation of structure and function to the environment but there’s no reason to extrapolate this theory in order for it to account for life’s origin. In future centuries, human technology will develop terraforming and incredibly advanced bioengineering of cells - amino acids, proteins, water, nucleic acids, etc which were gathered in space or on planets and combined (science already knows these molecules exist out there). This could account for life’s origin since it agrees with 19th-century chemist Louis Pasteur’s proving that life can only originate from life. The origin-of-life hypothesis presented here obviously needs time travel back to a time when there was no life. This is feasible using General Relativity's concept of curved time (which is made circular via Wick rotation and future warping of space-time).
It's convenient to say Wick rotation is a form of mathematical trickery but explanation of the photoelectric effect seems to have sprung directly from Max Planck's idea of quanta - now called photons - which was also regarded for years as a mathematical convenience. Could an extension of evolution spring directly from the supposed math trickery of Wick rotation? We only need to be open to our current interpretations of science and maths not being set in stone. History has shown that presently accepted theories always change. And we are not the endpoint of history - we're simply one more step passing through it.
Rodney Bartlett
Sorry, in my view this is just another turn in the wheel of hopelessness!
Just a single sentence convinced me!
"Evolution can be observed in the form of adaptation of structure and function to the environment but there’s no reason to extrapolate this theory in order for it to account for life’s origin"
The main aspect of this problem is the frequency and intensity of interaction between the elements of the Multiverse. If these parameters are large enough, then natural selection can produce results that would seem unprofitable and very strange in our Universe, but quite rational in one or more parallel ones.
concept of evolution and its relationship with the multiverse is a fascinating intersection of two complex scientific ideas. Here’s a discussion on how these concepts can relate and some perspectives on their implications:
Evolution and Its Basis in Biology
Multiverse Theory and Its Implications
Intersection and Philosophical Considerations
Impresion-
The relationship between evolution and the multiverse is primarily speculative and philosophical at present, with ongoing scientific inquiry into both fields independently. Evolution remains firmly grounded in biological sciences with abundant empirical evidence, while multiverse theories remain theoretical constructs within cosmology and theoretical physics. Exploring their intersection can inspire broader perspectives on the nature of life, the universe, and our place within it, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue and deeper philosophical reflections
- Badges
- Science topic