It is my personal feeling and observation (may be wrong also) that RG members, when in a scientific discussion, paste a lot of reference materials or paste material from some website/paper.

Categorically speaking, here, I do not oppose referring to any valid/relevant article. Rather the candidate may write the essence of the article for justifying his/her stance.

I feel, too much of reference materials keeps us from improving our thought process and article-framing capacity.

What I feel is we all must be able to think and frame statements on our own philosophy of our subject/science.

Philosophy is what a subject has imparted us along a course of time ever since we all started studying it.

Philosophy helps us understanding a problem in a better and concise manner. For the obvious reasons, the problem-solving would be better.

Regards,

MKD

More Manoj Kumar Dabi's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions