The short answer is no. Scientific work is a collective undertaking, not the work of a single individual. To appreciate this, consider the fact that 'scientific genius' becomes a meaningful notion only when there is an assembly of scientists present, whereby a comparison (of capabilities, achievements, etc.) becomes possible. In fact, to sharpen the notion of 'scientific genius' this assembly must be sufficiently large, since being first in a group consisting of, say, two need not signify any significant intellectual prowess. Incidentally, a mature scientist does not set out to 'shine', but to understand and share with others what he or she has understood. 'Shining' follows deep insight and understanding. Further, even the greatest intellects need intellectual stimulation and opposition, or their intellects will become dull over time.
There is the communist view, prevalent today in the scientific community, that nobody should "shine" but follow the herd. And there is the hard fact that there are better scientists than others. The question is, are they necessarily geniuses? Depends on the definition of genius. The common one is someone who shine. As to *absolute* genius, it is still awaiting a definition.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Theoretical Physics