Argument pro incorporation of material/efficient causes in modern physics:

Atoms, or subatomic components. For example, the material cause of a metal rod is the arrangement of its atoms and the elements present. Physics textbooks and research routinely identify the matter or substance involved in any phenomenon, directly paralleling Aristotle’s material cause

Efficient Causes:

Physics also addresses efficient causes, though its approach differs from Aristotle’s. In modern science, the efficient cause is typically the force, interaction, or process that brings about a change-such as gravity causing a stone to fall, or electromagnetic forces causing electrons to move. However, Aristotle viewed efficient causes as requiring a continuously acting agent, whereas modern physics often describes efficient causes in terms of initial conditions and natural laws

Arguments against

Of course a def of efficient cause as " a well defined work that leads to a clear effect simultaneously linked to which" , is lacking in modern physics but their above approach is modeling via mathematical or other abstractions

Although physics deals with material causes per se , in substance these are dealt via equations and ABSTRACTIONS which are nothing but material causes