My theory of Matter/Anti-matter is unprecedented, it is new, and I believe there is no anti-matter! The Universe is made of duality, but matter/anti-matter is not duality. The mother of all mass is Hydrogen atom as we know it is making our periodic table. This Hydrogen has complementary partner which it is Sun-hydrogen. One is creating Life, and other is protecting life. Or the universe is QM universe, and it created based on duality. Like Einstein stated Time-Space.

Javad Fardaei

JF> “My theory of Matter/Anti-matter is unprecedented, it is new, and I believe there is no anti-matter!”

Your theory is neither “unprecedented” nor it is “new”! As apparently an official cosmologist you probably know better than I do!

It is the standard theory of official physics and also of the Vatican, and is supposed be the only theory that is consistent with the idea of the “Big Bang Creation” of the universe. There were supposed to be equal amont of matter and antimatter created from the “spontaneous symmetry breaking” of the “Cosmic Egg”. Most of the matter and antimatter so created (so the story goes) initially, annihilated each other giving EM radiation that cooled down with the expansion of the universe to forms the CMBR as we see today. But (this is the fun part) there was some tinny imperfection in the symmetry breaking, making a little excess of matter over antimatter. This tiny excess matter is what makes the galaxies, the stars, the planets, and everything else in the universe including us that we see today.

But your theory and that of official physics is wrong. As I said in my comment above, antimatter is ubiquitous in the universe. We have direct “proof” from cosmic rays, we use it in PET scans and so on! My main point in raising this question is that among many other things, the fact of the presence of large scale antimatter in the universe itself disproves the “Big Bang” theory. What is more, this theory has no meaning in an infinite, eternal and ever-changing universe. Matter and antimatter exist everywhere in a dialectical contradiction of the “unity and opposites”; the never ending resolution of this contradiction is what gives rise to the evolution and the manifestation of this infinite universe. The following are links to some my works in support of a dialectical universe:

Article The Infinite - As a Hegelian Philosophical Category and Its ...

Article Ambartsumian, Arp and the Breeding Galaxies*

https://www.amazon.ca/Dialectical-Universe-Some-Reflections-Cosmology/dp/9840414445

I do not following the Big Bang theory for many reasons. 1) at very earlier the BB theory, it was designed for one galaxy universe, and two decades later we find out that universe has billion of galaxies. But the BB theory never changed. 2) The BB theory is talking about "Infinite" while infinite does not exist in our living world. Infinite is relative. 3) the bb theory is pronounced when human did not know QM science, while we know now, the building block of universe is QM phenomenon. 4) in BB theory everything is a Mechanical remark, and the matter/anti-matter is result of this unscientific theory. 5) the result of BB theory we came up with many more unscientific remark, such as multi-dimension, black holes, locality of Time, mechanical Gravity, and yet we do not know the origination of anything, such mass, all forces, ….I know my theory very well, and it is unprecedented theory. It is hard to understand my theory for such mainstream believer. I hope my plenary speak to few up coming 2019 Quantum Physics around the world, will change some vision of our scientists like you. best

Javad Fardaei

You do not know anything about my ideas on these issues, and now it seems that you have little idea about the Big Bang theory as well. Big Bang theory categorically forbids an infinite universe. Einstein's GR is absolutely based on a finite universe, because it does not make any sense in an infinite universe.

The concept of the Infinite is the major point of contention of my dialectics and quantum electrodynamics (QED) based views of the infinite, eternal and ever-changing universe. All causality based theories of the universe lead to a "first cause" - the "effect" of a "cause" of a beginning or creation that is unknown or unknowable and hence a mystery. Also, all causality based theories of the universe must be finite both in time and also in extension; no matter how long in time and extended in space it is!

A dialectical universe has no "first cause", no beginning and no end! Please read the first two short articles linked in my comment above to know my position, before we can have any meaningful dialogue. The dialectics based idea of the infinite universe is the exact opposite of any causality based theories of the universe. If you are not using dialectics in your theory, it cannot be much better than other causality based theories, like the Big Bang theory; and we would be arguing for nothing. Thanks!

If you seekers want to know the reality then you should check a theory in my RG account named as 'The Aryan theory' or 'The Engine of Nature'.

Before starting reading you have to promiss me that after understanding that you have the do favour for me, you will publish that in 'Nature Journal' bcz of lack of time i am not able to fulfill the formalities of this journal and this is very important to be done, for the humanity and nature.

you can put your name with that writer name.

RAM NARESH YADAV

Sir, you are offering us (the poor earthlings) a palace on the moon, for a very little price of expounding your grande ('The Aryan theory' or 'The Engine of Nature') theory and publishing it in Nature - the mother of all journals, with the possible promise of a Nobel Award!

Well, it should be obvious to you by now that there is no taker of your superb offer even after a week. It simply means that no one in RG (at least) is willing to share your delusion - to speak generously of your malaise, Sir. It is of little surprise that claims to the knowledge of the final truth of the world should originate in the spiritual East, particularly in obscurantist and Hindu fundamentalist (reinforced recently with Narendra Modi as the Prime minister) India; where positive knowledge of the world is the least developed among the general population and the degradation of humanity is the highest! I had the fortune (or misfortune) of encountering in the recent past, two more of such earth-shattering claims (from India) in another forum: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_Any_Effective_Refutation_of_Einsteins_Theories_of_Relativity_Possible

Dear Abdul Malek sir,

First of all i am not interested to do debates ok.

Second thing i am not like a person who is willing for to become famous or get any awards ok.

Third thing is that if anybody have found something which is critical then it should be well checked and understand.

whereas i want it to get published in nature journal so that the world should take it seriously and take some action if it is right, means this efford is just for to put this paper in front of authority which take it into account.

For you i have a suggestion to please take this attitude somewhere else ok.

overall the science of nature does not belongs to only you kind of people and its not your property, if you are not able to understand then its better for you to be quite right.

and the last thing is that i am not offering it instead all of the humans have lust to get some benifit so i did it for your profit.

i hope you understand it.