Dear Colleagues,
Peer-review isn't working well, and it needs an overhaul. In the time of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and remote work, it doesn't make sense to wait for months just to receive few lines rejecting an excellent manuscript or accepting a poor one!
Would you spend five minutes to answer a questionnaire on Google forms, and help SCIENEUM.io solve this problem for all of us?
This is it: https://forms.gle/2BskfDeAoeqKf5Wt5
Are you one of us? https://youtu.be/ewOuhohAjWc
Write your comment below!
I never reject excellent articles because I critique the overall research plan and methodology and don't get hung up on single sentences. But I also review every sentence in detail :)
While peer-review is an essential process in ensuring the quality of scientific research, it is not perfect and can be subject to biases, errors, and delays. The use of technology such as AI and blockchain has the potential to improve the efficiency and transparency of the peer-review process. However, it is important to consider the ethical implications and potential unintended consequences of implementing these technologies in scientific research.
Dear Khalid M. Saqr
Thank you for bringing up the issue regarding the inefficiencies of the current peer-review system. I completely agree that in this era of advanced technology and remote work, waiting extended periods to receive minimal feedback on manuscripts is frustrating and counterproductive.
I appreciate the initiative taken to address this problem and am more than willing to contribute to finding a solution. Conducting a questionnaire on Google Forms and helping SCIENEUM.com seems like a practical approach to gathering insights and opinions from the scientific community. I will gladly complete the questionnaire and provide my input.
Thank you for highlighting this issue to contribute towards a more efficient peer-review system.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence